Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include UUID with each URL metric #1489

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 21, 2024
Merged

Include UUID with each URL metric #1489

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 21, 2024

Conversation

westonruter
Copy link
Member

When working with URL metrics, I found it difficult when debugging to not have a stable identifier as part of a given URL metric instance. This adds a uuid field to the URL metric to serve as this stable identifier.

@westonruter westonruter added [Type] Enhancement A suggestion for improvement of an existing feature [Plugin] Optimization Detective Issues for the Optimization Detective plugin labels Aug 21, 2024
@westonruter westonruter self-assigned this Aug 21, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 21, 2024

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message.

Co-authored-by: westonruter <westonruter@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: adamsilverstein <adamsilverstein@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: felixarntz <flixos90@git.wordpress.org>

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

Copy link
Member

@adamsilverstein adamsilverstein left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

singular

Copy link
Member

@felixarntz felixarntz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@westonruter LGTM, just one nit-pick.

@@ -65,6 +66,9 @@ final class OD_URL_Metric implements JsonSerializable {
* @throws OD_Data_Validation_Exception When the input is invalid.
*/
public function __construct( array $data ) {
if ( ! array_key_exists( 'uuid', $data ) ) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

isset() is faster than array_key_exists(), this has been subject of several core changes. I'd argue anyway that it would be safer to use the following here to ensure this is never empty:

Suggested change
if ( ! array_key_exists( 'uuid', $data ) ) {
if ( ! isset( $data['uuid'] ) || ! $data['uuid'] ) {

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good, but what about #1219?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess we should reduce the scope of that issue to remove use of empty() only.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, the ! $data['uuid'] part is flagged by PHPStan's strict rules:

Only booleans are allowed in a negated boolean, mixed given.

So I'll just commit the ! isset( $data['uuid'] ) part. The JSON Schema will handle validation of uuid. It should be absent for everyone right now, resulting in a new uuid being assigned to all existing URL metrics whenever a new URL metric is captured and added to an od_url_metrics post.

Done in 7a1b892

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, I don't think there's any problem with isset() when used with array keys or object properties. In other words, isset( $arr['something'] ) is perfectly fine, but isset( $something ) is not.

It's a good idea to remove empty() usages and, if reasonable to implement, also warn about using isset() when it's not with array keys or object properties.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only booleans are allowed in a negated boolean, mixed given.

On another note, this is the only thing that PHPStan complains about that I don't like. I don't like writing '' === $value just as little as I like writing false === $value, and I don't see any benefit of preventing ! on a string. What is the benefit? 🤔

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While I agree it can be annoying at times, I think the explicitness is good for type safety and making sure that you're always working with the data you expect. Otherwise, I had to ask Gemini for advice: https://g.co/gemini/share/270a3e76fcdd

@swissspidy may have more thoughts.

Co-authored-by: felixarntz <flixos90@git.wordpress.org>
@westonruter westonruter merged commit 81842e5 into trunk Aug 21, 2024
17 checks passed
@westonruter westonruter deleted the add/od-debugging branch August 21, 2024 18:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Plugin] Optimization Detective Issues for the Optimization Detective plugin [Type] Enhancement A suggestion for improvement of an existing feature
Projects
Status: Done 😃
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants