no rechunking for microphysics summary

[HenningSE]

No description provided.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8017799725

Details

• 0 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.01%) to 68.615%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 8003613039:	0.01%
Covered Lines:	1655
Relevant Lines:	2412

---

💛 - Coveralls

[HenningSE]

Looks like our field map returned a few nan values that stoped nestpy from returning quanta. The last commit will set nan fields to 0 and print a warning message similar to the negative field values.

[cfuselli]

I tested it extensively and the change did solve the problems I had with the NaN values in the field. Works well now.
Thanks @HenningSE !

[ramirezdiego]

Hey both, could we narrow down where in the detector these NaN pop up? Just to be sure the map handling is good and we are here addressing cases where the field is beyond our sensitive volume (also to decide if setting it to zero is the right fix).

[ramirezdiego]

Hey both, could we narrow down where in the detector these NaN pop up? Just to be sure the map handling is good and we are here addressing cases where the field is beyond our sensitive volume (also to decide if setting it to zero is the right fix).

All good. @HenningSE checked the position of NaNs in our field maps and these make valid the clipping to zero.