-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 315
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider releasing ARM64 binary file #266
Comments
Hi there, thank you for the tip! It looks like it has to be targeted specifically at glib for GNU/Linux, musl would require a separate binary. #267 is currently there to implement this, I'll run some tests locally using |
Please let me know if artifact in https://github.com/Y2Z/monolith/releases/tag/v2.6.1 works. |
The glibc it was linked against seems a little bit too high. Nowadays many docker images are built upon $ ./monolith -h
./monolith: /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.29' not found (required by ./monolith)
$ ldd --version ldd
ldd (Debian GLIBC 2.28-10) 2.28
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Written by Roland McGrath and Ulrich Drepper.
$ cat /etc/issue
Debian GNU/Linux 10 \n \l
|
Oh, interesting... it seems like only Ubuntu 20.04 (that GitHub Actions provides) has ARM64 packages, but I'll double-check now with Ubuntu 18.04, Glibc should be older there. |
Please let me know if this is still needed. And meanwhile, found this page full of builds for various architectures and OSes, although can't vouch for how secure that stuff is, I don't use sourceforge: https://sourceforge.net/mirror/monolith/activity/?page=0&limit=100 |
Sorry I've been off GitHub for some days so did not receive notifications for this thread. I'll test the latest release tonight and provide feedback later. |
Ok, ARM binary from the latest release ( |
Currently
armhf
binary is included in release artifacts, but to runarmhf
executables on anARM64
(aarch64
) OS it seems like you need ia32 related libs installed. Would you consider building foraarch64
when releasingmonolith
? On such machine the target info is like this:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: