Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade libxmljs from 0.19.7 to 0.19.8 #30

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

merge advice

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • package.json
    • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-LIBXMLJS-2348756
No Proof of Concept
Commit messages
Package name: libxmljs The new version differs by 7 commits.
  • 27c9084 Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/libxmljs/libxmljs
  • 622360d v0.19.8
  • 3d54d57 use github action to prebuild + upload assets to github (#595)
  • 6cd3e04 Added encoding for toString() method (#482)
  • 1768388 v0.19.8
  • 2501807 Ensure parseXml/parseHtml input is string or buffer (#594)
  • d6e4cf3 Adjust the version of the c++ standard libraries used to build on Mac. This fixes the build on Node 16 on Macs. (#593)

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant