Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: (typescript-vm) - Update getMatchingPathsRecursive parameter… #64

Conversation

iNewLegend
Copy link
Member

@iNewLegend iNewLegend commented Jun 9, 2024

User description

…s in workspace-provider.js

The parameters for the getMatchingPathsRecursive function in workspace-provider.js have been updated. The root path is combined with the directory name gotten from the packagesPathPattern and the RegExp pattern used in searching the packages is also modified.


PR Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Updated the getMatchingPathsRecursive function parameters in workspace-provider.js.
  • Combined rootPath with the directory name from packagesPathPattern.
  • Modified the RegExp pattern used for searching package.json files.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Bug fix
workspace-provider.js
Update `getMatchingPathsRecursive` parameters and RegExp pattern

packages/zenflux-typescript-vm/src/providers/workspace-provider.js

  • Updated the getMatchingPathsRecursive function parameters.
  • Combined rootPath with the directory name from packagesPathPattern.
  • Modified the RegExp pattern for searching package.json files.
  • +2/-2     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    …s in `workspace-provider.js`
    
    The parameters for the `getMatchingPathsRecursive` function in `workspace-provider.js` have been updated. The root path is combined with the directory name gotten from the `packagesPathPattern` and the RegExp pattern used in searching the packages is also modified.
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the changes are limited to a single function in one file, and the modifications are straightforward involving parameter updates and a regular expression change.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    ⚡ Possible issues

    Possible Bug: The new RegExp pattern "/*/package.json" might not work as intended. The pattern seems to aim for any subdirectory, but in RegExp, * matches zero or more of the preceding element. This might result in incorrect or no path matches. Consider using ".*/package.json" to correctly match any subdirectory.

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible bug
    Correct the regular expression to match any directories containing package.json

    Modify the regular expression to correctly match directories for package.json. The current
    expression "/*/package.json" might not work as intended. Use "
    /package.json" to match
    any directories.**

    packages/zenflux-typescript-vm/src/providers/workspace-provider.js [89]

    -new RegExp("/*/package.json")
    +new RegExp("**/package.json")
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: The suggested change to the regular expression is crucial for correctly matching directories containing package.json. The current expression is likely incorrect, and this fix addresses a potential bug.

    9
    Best practice
    Use path.resolve to ensure correct path resolution

    Consider using path.resolve instead of path.join for constructing the path. path.resolve
    will handle cases where the packagesPathPattern might start with a slash, which could lead
    to incorrect paths when used with path.join.

    packages/zenflux-typescript-vm/src/providers/workspace-provider.js [88]

    -path.join(rootPath, path.dirname(packagesPathPattern))
    +path.resolve(rootPath, path.dirname(packagesPathPattern))
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Using path.resolve can prevent potential issues with incorrect path resolution, especially if packagesPathPattern starts with a slash. This is a good practice to ensure robust path handling.

    8
    Enhancement
    Add error handling for the getMatchingPathsRecursive function

    Consider adding error handling for the getMatchingPathsRecursive function to manage cases
    where the path resolution fails or the regex does not match any files.

    packages/zenflux-typescript-vm/src/providers/workspace-provider.js [87-92]

    -const workspacesPackageJsons = getMatchingPathsRecursive(
    -    path.join(rootPath, path.dirname(packagesPathPattern)),
    -    new RegExp("/*/package.json"),
    -    2, {
    -        ignoreStartsWith: [ ".", "#" ]
    -    }
    -)
    +try {
    +    const workspacesPackageJsons = getMatchingPathsRecursive(
    +        path.join(rootPath, path.dirname(packagesPathPattern)),
    +        new RegExp("/*/package.json"),
    +        2, {
    +            ignoreStartsWith: [ ".", "#" ]
    +        }
    +    )
    +} catch (error) {
    +    console.error("Failed to get matching paths:", error);
    +}
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Adding error handling is a good enhancement for robustness, ensuring that failures in path resolution or regex matching are properly managed and logged.

    7
    Possible issue
    Verify the implementation of ignoreStartsWith to ensure it functions correctly

    Ensure that the ignoreStartsWith option in the configuration object is correctly
    implemented to ignore paths starting with specified characters. Verify that the
    implementation of getMatchingPathsRecursive handles this configuration as expected.

    packages/zenflux-typescript-vm/src/providers/workspace-provider.js [91]

    -ignoreStartsWith: [ ".", "#" ]
    +ignoreStartsWith: [ ".", "#" ]  // Ensure this is correctly implemented in getMatchingPathsRecursive
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3

    Why: While it's important to verify the implementation, this suggestion does not provide a concrete improvement to the code itself. It is more of a reminder than an actionable change.

    3

    @iNewLegend iNewLegend merged commit 3b04721 into ZenFlux:main Jun 9, 2024
    3 of 4 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant