Documentation

[szaghi]

Hi Adriano,

I follow your progress with interest, I think this project has great potential. However, the lack of documentation limits me (and maybe others) to digg deeper. I am counscious that writing documentation is a time-consuming effort, but it has not less relevance of the code itself (IMHO). Have you a plan to add documentation in the near future (or it is already here and I am so blind to have missed it)?

Thank you very much for sharing your work.

Stefano

[aamaricci]

Hi Stefano,
thanks for your interest.

You're right about the missing documentation.
This is a feature I'd like to add. I mean it is in the todo list, together with other extensions I have in my pipeline (sparse matrices, sparse linalg, ode solvers, a better interface to quadpack, etc.).

In any case my plan for the future would be to use FORD. I played a bit with other tools, but this one looks pretty nice and well suited for SciFor.

This, and the aforementioned extensions, could be an excellent basis for a collaborative work, but on the other hand I understand that with no documentation whatsoever that's kind of desperate act (and the main reason why I did not deployed the library to FOSS).

Cheers,
A

[szaghi]

@aamaricci Great! Happy to read this! FORD is really a cool tool.

I will continue to track this project.

See you soon.

[funnell]

Just to chime in, I'm also interested in this project. But, without documentation it's difficult to get started...

[aamaricci]

Hi. Thanks for your interest.
I should definitively start working on that.
A

[band-a-prend]

I'm also interested in documentation as the first looked example for python scipy as reference for this project used lambda function passed into.

E.g. it was general integration (quad): https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/tutorial/integrate.html