Get unread count for user

[danischreiber]

No description provided.

[abrom]

Feature looks good @danischreiber

Suggest we hold off merging this until the feature has been merged into the server api. That PR seems to be held up for a code format issue too??

[abrom]

the build is wanting these two lines to be only indented once vs twice

[danischreiber]

Thanks, I resubmitted the PR in rocketchat. We can wait to merge until it gets in.

…

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Andrew Bromwich ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. Feature looks good @danischreiber <https://github.com/danischreiber> Suggest we hold off merging this until the feature has been merged into the server api. That PR seems to be held up for a code format issue too?? ------------------------------ In lib/rocket_chat/messages/user.rb <#18 (comment)>: > @@ -126,6 +126,21 @@ def info(user_id: nil, username: nil) end # + # users.unread_count REST API + # @param [String] user_id Rocket.Chat user id + # @param [String] username Username + # @return [User] + # @raise [HTTPError, StatusError] + # + def unread_count(user_id: nil, username: nil) + response = session.request_json( + '/api/v1/users.unreadCount', the build is wanting these two lines to be only indented once vs twice — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#18 (review)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEWU-8OZ5CVgP-q1c2yeSSjxjXbSDNZ7ks5seU2PgaJpZM4PF9Xf> .

[abrom]

Hey @danischreiber, it looks like your PR in the rocketchat repo for this has gone stale?? Might be worth pinging them to get a review underway

[abrom]

Hey @danischreiber, still no movement on your PR in the rocketchat repo? I can't see the end-point in the users API.