NOISSUE - Add Comment to Docker Compose Project Name #1895
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1895 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 66.94% 66.94%
=======================================
Files 118 118
Lines 9080 9080
=======================================
Hits 6079 6079
Misses 2372 2372
Partials 629 629 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
dborovcanin
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2023
rodneyosodo
force-pushed
the
NOISSUE-makefile
branch
from
c7392ef
to
f85a064
Compare
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <blackd0t@protonmail.com>
rodneyosodo
force-pushed
the
NOISSUE-makefile
branch
from
f85a064
to
6d3b0b8
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this do?
Add a comment about to how docker-compose project name should be structured
Which issue(s) does this PR fix/relate to?
No issue
List any changes that modify/break current functionality
None
Have you included tests for your changes?
No
Did you document any new/modified functionality?
Yes, by comment.
Notes
Follow up on https://github.com/mainflux/mainflux/pull/1894