Benchmark for comparing the merge/galloping join algorithm with the hash join algorithm #956
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ning of the benchmark infrastructure development and then became deprecated.
…hmark and tried updating it to work with the new version of the benchmark infrastructure.
…ark configuration.
…c benchmark table generation into configuration options.
…n a template function.
…esult as a table column.
…Added getter for the size of the table.
…t to a ResultTable.
…now no longer creates names, but takes them as an argument.
…mplementation and added the general point in time, in which the benchmark measuring was finished, to the general metadata.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #956 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.85% 88.85% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 326 326
Lines 28926 28926
Branches 3205 3205
==========================================
- Hits 25703 25702 -1
Misses 2070 2070
- Partials 1153 1154 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
…ames to fit standard.
…iers to make things more readable.
…tures with explicit captures.
…rsion with explicit conversion.
…ames to fit standard.
…ing the time to a string in accordance with Sonarclouds wishes.
…here the smaller table keeps the same size and the bigger table grows. Now there are multiple benchmark tables, each with a different number of rows in the smaller table.
…sing, inside the master branch.
…setting the minimum amount of rows in the smaller table.
…arking classes for debugging purpose.
…e benchmarking classes for debugging purpose." This reverts commit aeef1f1.
… memory has to be big enoughfor the min number of rows given via configuration options.
…n [1,10] to the row ratios, used by the benchmark.
|
joka921
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2024
Comment on lines
219
to
221
| /* | ||
| The number of rows. | ||
| */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| /* | |
| The number of rows. | |
| */ | |
| // The number of rows. |
Comment on lines
224
to
226
| /* | ||
| The number of columns. | ||
| */ |
Comment on lines
213
to
217
| /* | ||
| If nobody played around with the private member variables, every row | ||
| should have the same amount of columns and there should be AT LEAST one row, | ||
| and one column. So we can just return the length of the first row. | ||
| */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| /* | |
| If nobody played around with the private member variables, every row | |
| should have the same amount of columns and there should be AT LEAST one row, | |
| and one column. So we can just return the length of the first row. | |
| */ | |
| // Every row has the same number of columns, so we just return the length of the first row. |
Comment on lines
28
to
32
| Note: This will cause an exception, if the row and column is bigger | ||
| than the table. However, such a situation should only happen, if this | ||
| function was called with the wrong column numbers, in which case it | ||
| ain't our problem and can only be fixed by the user. | ||
| */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would replace this Note by the three AD_CONTRACT_CHECK(columnTo... < table->numColumns()).
Comment on lines
+4
to
+5
| // Author of the file this file is based on: Björn Buchhold | ||
| // (buchhold@informatik.uni-freiburg.de) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| // Author of the file this file is based on: Björn Buchhold | |
| // (buchhold@informatik.uni-freiburg.de) |
(I think you wrote this one all by yourself, didn't you?)
benchmark/JoinAlgorithmBenchmark.cpp
Outdated
Comment on lines
45
to
47
| static void createOverlapRandomly(IdTableAndJoinColumn* const smallerTable, | ||
| const IdTableAndJoinColumn& biggerTable, | ||
| const double probabilityToCreateOverlap) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this helper should be in the same helper/util file that also creates random IdTables.
And all of those should also work with multiple join columns to make life easier later when we also benchmark join on multiple columns.
This requires basically changing IdTableAndJoinColumn to IdTableAndJoinColumns etc.
benchmark/JoinAlgorithmBenchmark.cpp
Outdated
| */ | ||
| void parseConfiguration(const BenchmarkConfiguration& config) { | ||
| numberRows = | ||
| config.getValueByNestedKeys<size_t>("numberRows").value_or(100); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
maybe rather numRows. numberRows sounds strange and numberOfRows is too long:)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An exhaustive benchmark for the comparison of the two implementations that also showcases the usage of our benchmarking library.