This project is an interbreeding of the acornjs and the Esprima.NET parsers, with the intention of creating an even more complete and performant ECMAScript (a.k.a JavaScript) parser library for .NET by combining the best bits of those.
It should also be mentioned that there is an earlier .NET port of acornjs, AcornSharp, which though is unmaintained for a long time, served as a good starting point. Had it not been for AcornSharp, this project would probably have never started.
- The tokenizer is mostly a direct translation of the acornjs tokenizer to C# (with many bigger and smaller performance improvements, partly inspired by Esprima.NET) - apart from the regex validation/conversion logic, which has been borrowed from Esprima.NET currently.
- The parser is ~99% acornjs (also with a bunch of minor improvements) and ~1% Esprima.NET (strict mode detection, public API). It is also worth mentioning that the error reporting has been changed to use the error messages of V8.
- It includes protection against the non-catchable
StackOverflowException
using the same approach as Roslyn. - Both projects follow the ESTree specification, so does Acornima. The actual AST implementation is based on that of Esprima.NET, with further minor improvements to the class hierarchy that bring it even closer to the spec and allow encoding a bit more information.
- The built-in AST visitors and additional utility features stems from Esprima.NET as well.
- A parser which already matches the performance of Esprima.NET, while doing more: it also passes the complete Test262 test suite for ECMAScript 2023.
- It is also more economic with regard to stack usage, so it can parse ~2x deeper structures.
- More options for fine-tuning parsing.
- A standalone tokenizer which can deal with most of the ambiguities of the JavaScript grammar (thanks to the clever context tracking solution implemented by acornjs).
- The parser tracks variable scopes to detect variable redeclarations. As of v1.1.0, it's able to expose the collected scope information to the consumer (see also this PR or this other example of usage).
dotnet add package Acornima
Or, if you want to use additional features like JSX parsing, JavaScript generation from AST or AST to JSON conversion:
dotnet add package Acornima.Extras
using Acornima;
var parser = new Parser();
Or, if you want to tweak the available settings:
var parser = new Parser(new ParserOptions { /* ... */ });
var ast = parser.ParseScript("console.log('Hello world!')");
Node [x]
├─AssignmentPattern : IDestructuringPatternElement [v,s]
├─CatchClause [v,s]
├─ClassBody [v,s]
├─ClassProperty : IClassElement, IProperty
│ ├─AccessorProperty : IClassElement, IProperty [v,s]
│ ├─MethodDefinition : IClassElement, IProperty [v,s]
│ └─PropertyDefinition : IClassElement, IProperty [v,s]
├─Decorator [v,s]
├─DestructuringPattern : IDestructuringPatternElement
│ ├─ArrayPattern : IDestructuringPatternElement [v,s]
│ └─ObjectPattern : IDestructuringPatternElement [v,s]
├─ImportAttribute [v,s]
├─ModuleSpecifier
│ ├─ExportSpecifier [v,s]
│ └─ImportDeclarationSpecifier
│ ├─ImportDefaultSpecifier [v,s]
│ ├─ImportNamespaceSpecifier [v,s]
│ └─ImportSpecifier [v,s]
├─Program : IHoistingScope [v]
│ ├─Module : IHoistingScope [s,t=Program]
│ └─Script : IHoistingScope [s,t=Program]
├─Property : IProperty
│ ├─AssignmentProperty : IProperty [v,s,t=Property]
│ └─ObjectProperty : IProperty [v,s,t=Property]
├─RestElement : IDestructuringPatternElement [v,s]
├─StatementOrExpression
│ ├─Expression [x]
│ │ ├─ArrayExpression [v,s]
│ │ ├─ArrowFunctionExpression : IFunction [v,s]
│ │ ├─AssignmentExpression [v,s]
│ │ ├─AwaitExpression [v,s]
│ │ ├─BinaryExpression [v]
│ │ │ ├─LogicalExpression [s]
│ │ │ └─NonLogicalBinaryExpression [s,t=BinaryExpression]
│ │ ├─CallExpression : IChainElement [v,s]
│ │ ├─ChainExpression [v,s]
│ │ ├─ClassExpression : IClass [v,s]
│ │ ├─ConditionalExpression [v,s]
│ │ ├─FunctionExpression : IFunction [v,s]
│ │ ├─Identifier : IDestructuringPatternElement [v,s]
│ │ ├─ImportExpression [v,s]
│ │ ├─Literal [v]
│ │ │ ├─BigIntLiteral [s,t=Literal]
│ │ │ ├─BooleanLiteral [s,t=Literal]
│ │ │ ├─NullLiteral [s,t=Literal]
│ │ │ ├─NumericLiteral [s,t=Literal]
│ │ │ ├─RegExpLiteral [s,t=Literal]
│ │ │ └─StringLiteral [s,t=Literal]
│ │ ├─MemberExpression : IChainElement, IDestructuringPatternElement [v,s]
│ │ ├─MetaProperty [v,s]
│ │ ├─NewExpression [v,s]
│ │ ├─ObjectExpression [v,s]
│ │ ├─ParenthesizedExpression [v,s]
│ │ ├─PrivateIdentifier [v,s]
│ │ ├─SequenceExpression [v,s]
│ │ ├─SpreadElement [v,s]
│ │ ├─Super [v,s]
│ │ ├─TaggedTemplateExpression [v,s]
│ │ ├─TemplateLiteral [v,s]
│ │ ├─ThisExpression [v,s]
│ │ ├─UnaryExpression [v]
│ │ │ ├─NonUpdateUnaryExpression [s,t=UnaryExpression]
│ │ │ └─UpdateExpression [s]
│ │ └─YieldExpression [v,s]
│ └─Statement [x]
│ ├─BlockStatement [v]
│ │ ├─FunctionBody : IHoistingScope [v,s,t=BlockStatement]
│ │ ├─NestedBlockStatement [s,t=BlockStatement]
│ │ └─StaticBlock : IClassElement, IHoistingScope [v,s]
│ ├─BreakStatement [v,s]
│ ├─ContinueStatement [v,s]
│ ├─DebuggerStatement [v,s]
│ ├─Declaration [x]
│ │ ├─ClassDeclaration : IClass [v,s]
│ │ ├─FunctionDeclaration : IFunction [v,s]
│ │ ├─ImportOrExportDeclaration
│ │ │ ├─ExportDeclaration
│ │ │ │ ├─ExportAllDeclaration [v,s]
│ │ │ │ ├─ExportDefaultDeclaration [v,s]
│ │ │ │ └─ExportNamedDeclaration [v,s]
│ │ │ └─ImportDeclaration [v,s]
│ │ └─VariableDeclaration [v,s]
│ ├─DoWhileStatement [v,s]
│ ├─EmptyStatement [v,s]
│ ├─ExpressionStatement [v]
│ │ ├─Directive [s,t=ExpressionStatement]
│ │ └─NonSpecialExpressionStatement [s,t=ExpressionStatement]
│ ├─ForInStatement [v,s]
│ ├─ForOfStatement [v,s]
│ ├─ForStatement [v,s]
│ ├─IfStatement [v,s]
│ ├─LabeledStatement [v,s]
│ ├─ReturnStatement [v,s]
│ ├─SwitchStatement [v,s]
│ ├─ThrowStatement [v,s]
│ ├─TryStatement [v,s]
│ ├─WhileStatement [v,s]
│ └─WithStatement [v,s]
├─SwitchCase [v,s]
├─TemplateElement [v,s]
└─VariableDeclarator [v,s]
Legend:
v
- A visitation method is generated in the visitors for the node type.s
- The node class is sealed. (It's beneficial to check for sealed types when possible.)t
- The node type (the value of theNode.Type
property) as specified by ESTree (shown only if it differs from the name of the node class).x
- The node class can be subclassed. (The AST provides some limited extensibility for special use cases.)
The library also supports the syntax extension JSX.
However, mostly for performance reasons, the related functionality is separated from the core parser: it is available in the Acornima.Extras
package, in the Acornima.Jsx
namespace.
After installing the Acornima.Extras
package as described in the Getting started section, you can parse JSX code like this:
using Acornima.Jsx;
var parser = new JsxParser(new JsxParserOptions { /* ... */ });
var ast = parser.ParseScript("<>Hello world!</>");
Node [x]
└─StatementOrExpression
└─Expression [x]
└─JsxNode [x]
├─JsxAttributeLike
│ ├─JsxAttribute [v,s]
│ └─JsxSpreadAttribute [v,s]
├─JsxClosingTag
│ ├─JsxClosingElement [v,s]
│ └─JsxClosingFragment [v,s]
├─JsxElementOrFragment
│ ├─JsxElement [v,s]
│ └─JsxFragment [v,s]
├─JsxEmptyExpression [v,s]
├─JsxExpressionContainer [v,s]
├─JsxName
│ ├─JsxIdentifier [v,s]
│ ├─JsxMemberExpression [v,s]
│ └─JsxNamespacedName [v,s]
├─JsxOpeningTag
│ ├─JsxOpeningElement [v,s]
│ └─JsxOpeningFragment [v,s]
└─JsxText [v,s]
Projects using Esprima.NET can be converted to Acornima relatively easily as the public API of the two libraries are very similar. (A pretty good proof of this statement is this PR, which migrates Jint to Acornima.)
The most notable changes to keep in mind with regard to migration are the following:
- The default value of the
ParserOptions.RegExpParseMode
property has been changed toRegExpParseMode.Validate
. - The default value of the
ParserOptions.RegexTimeout
property has been changed to 5 seconds. - The default value of the
ParserOptions.Tolerant
property has been changed tofalse
. - The
Location
struct has been renamed toSourceLocation
. - The
TokenType
andCommentType
enums have been renamed named toTokenKind
andCommentKind
, respectively. Also, some of the member names have been changed. - The
Token
andComment
structs have been completely reworked. TheSyntaxToken
andSyntaxComment
classes have been removed. - The
SyntaxElement
class has been removed, that is, theNode
class has become the root of the AST node type hierarchy. (This also means that tokens and comments are not attached to the root nodes of the AST. You can obtain those via theParserOptions.OnToken
andParserOptions.OnComment
callbacks). - The
Nodes
enum has been renamed named toNodeType
. - The
Node.AssociatedData
property has been renamed toUserData
. - The
AssignmentOperator
,BinaryOperator
andUnaryOperator
enums have been merged into a single enum namedOperator
. Also, some of the member names have been changed. - The
Literal
node class has been changed to only provide anobject? Value { get; }
property for accessing literal value. There are sealed subclasses for the different kinds of literals. Use those to access literal values in a type-safe (and more efficient) manner. - The
Property
node class has been made abstract and two sealed subclasses have been introduced:AssignmentProperty
andObjectProperty
(for representing properties of object destructuring patterns and object literals, respectively). Also, theVisitProperty
method has been replaced withVisitAssignmentProperty
andVisitObjectProperty
in visitors. - Similar changes have been made to the
BlockStatement
node class. Two new sealed subclasses have been introduced:FunctionBody
andNestedBlockStatement
(for representing bodies of function expressions/declarations and actual block statements that occurs within function bodies, respectively). Also, to conform to the ESTree spec,StaticBlock
has been changed to be a subclass ofBlockStatement
. TheVisitBlockStatement
method has been kept in visitors, but onlyNestedBlockStatement
is dispatched to it. The other two subclasses has dedicated visitation methods (VisitFunctionBody
andVisitStaticBlock
). - The
ClassElement
node base class has been replaced with theIClassElement
interface. - The
Strict
property of function expression/declaration node classes has been moved toFunctionBody
. - The
JsxExpression
node class has been renamed toJsxNode
. - The
JsxElement
node class has been renamed toJsxElementOrFragment
and two sealed subclasses have been introduced:JsxElement
andJsxFragment
. - The
ParserException
class has been renamed toParseErrorException
and been made abstract. Two concrete subclasses (SyntaxErrorException
andRegExpConversionError
) have been introduced to indicate different kinds of errors that can occur during parsing. - The message format of the
ParseErrorException
class has been changed. The reported messages are translatable text resources, so it is not recommended to rely on them to determine the reason of the error. For such purposes, you can use theParseErrorException.Error.Code
property. - The
ParseErrorException.Column
property has been changed to store zero-based indices. (The exception message still includes one-based column indices though.)
Method | Runtime | FileName | Mean | Allocated |
---|---|---|---|---|
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET 8.0 | angular-1.2.5 | 10.679 ms | 3978.22 KB |
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET Framework 4.8 | angular-1.2.5 | 22.905 ms | 3999.01 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET 8.0 | angular-1.2.5 | 11.443 ms | 3828.11 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET Framework 4.8 | angular-1.2.5 | 20.483 ms | 3879.53 KB |
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET 8.0 | backbone-1.1.0 | 1.428 ms | 629.26 KB |
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET Framework 4.8 | backbone-1.1.0 | 3.218 ms | 633.09 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET 8.0 | backbone-1.1.0 | 1.440 ms | 613.88 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET Framework 4.8 | backbone-1.1.0 | 2.903 ms | 620.3 KB |
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET 8.0 | jquery-1.9.1 | 8.066 ms | 3271.63 KB |
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET Framework 4.8 | jquery-1.9.1 | 18.210 ms | 3288.41 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET 8.0 | jquery-1.9.1 | 8.391 ms | 3305.23 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET Framework 4.8 | jquery-1.9.1 | 16.456 ms | 3355.15 KB |
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET 8.0 | jquery.mobile-1.4.2 | 14.253 ms | 5449.24 KB |
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET Framework 4.8 | jquery.mobile-1.4.2 | 29.750 ms | 5480.16 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET 8.0 | jquery.mobile-1.4.2 | 14.566 ms | 5428.48 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET Framework 4.8 | jquery.mobile-1.4.2 | 27.084 ms | 5497.48 KB |
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET 8.0 | mootools-1.4.5 | 6.735 ms | 2755.9 KB |
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET Framework 4.8 | mootools-1.4.5 | 14.818 ms | 2771.45 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET 8.0 | mootools-1.4.5 | 6.877 ms | 2777.83 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET Framework 4.8 | mootools-1.4.5 | 13.740 ms | 2816.33 KB |
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET 8.0 | underscore-1.5.2 | 1.214 ms | 529.61 KB |
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET Framework 4.8 | underscore-1.5.2 | 2.775 ms | 532.29 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET 8.0 | underscore-1.5.2 | 1.235 ms | 539.42 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET Framework 4.8 | underscore-1.5.2 | 2.501 ms | 547.18 KB |
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET 8.0 | yui-3.12.0 | 6.408 ms | 2611.82 KB |
Acornima v1.0.0 | .NET Framework 4.8 | yui-3.12.0 | 13.831 ms | 2628.61 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET 8.0 | yui-3.12.0 | 6.667 ms | 2585.78 KB |
Esprima v3.0.5 | .NET Framework 4.8 | yui-3.12.0 | 12.636 ms | 2624.92 KB |
The parser can be configured to convert JS regular expression literals to .NET Regex
instances (see ParserOptions.RegExpParseMode
).
However, because of the fundamental differences between the JS and .NET regex engines, in many cases this conversion can't be done perfectly (or, in some cases, at all):
- Case-insensitive matching won't always yield the same results. Implementing a workaround for this issue would be extremely hard, if not impossible.
- The JS regex engine assigns numbers to capturing groups sequentially (regardless of the group being named or not named) but .NET uses a different, weird approach: "Captures that use parentheses are numbered automatically from left to right based on the order of the opening parentheses in the regular expression, starting from 1. However, named capture groups are always ordered last, after non-named capture groups." Without some adjustments, this would totally mess up numbered backreferences and replace pattern references. So, as a workaround, the converter wraps all named capturing groups in a non-named capturing group to force .NET to include all the original capturing groups in the resulting match in the expected order. (Of course, this won't prevent named groups from being listed after the numbered ones.) If needed, the original number of groups can be obtained from the returned
RegExpParseResult
object'sActualRegexGroupCount
property. - The characters allowed in group names differs in the two regex engines. For example a the group name
$group
is valid in JS but invalid in .NET. So, as a workaround, the converter encodes the problematic group names to names that are valid in .NET and probably won't collide with other group names present in the pattern. For example,$group
is encoded like__utf8_2467726F7570
. The original group names can be obtained using the returnedRegExpParseResult
object'sGetRegexGroupName
method. - Self-referencing capturing groups like
/((a+)(\1) ?)+/
may not produce the exact same captures.RegexOptions.ECMAScript
is supposed to cover this, however even the MSDN example doesn't produce the same matches. (As a side note,RegexOptions.ECMAScript
is kinda a false promise, it can't even get some basic cases right by itself.) - Similarily, repeated nested groups like
/((a+)?(b+)?(c))*/
may produce different captures for the groups. (JS has an overwrite behavior while .NET doesn't). - .NET treats forward references like
\1(\w)
differently than JS and it's not possible to convert this kind of patterns reliably. (The converter could make some patterns work by rewriting them to something like(?:)(\w)
but there are cases where even this wouldn't work.) - Unicode mode issues:
- There could be false positive empty string matches in the middle of surrogate pairs. Patterns as simple as
/a?/u
will cause this issue when the input string contains astral Unicode chars. There is no out-of-the-box workaround for this issue but it can be mitigated somewhat using a bit of "post-processing", i.e., by filtering out the false positive matches after evaluation like it's done here. Probably there is no way to improve this situation until .NET adds the option to treat the input string as Unicode code points. - Support for Unicode property escapes is pretty limited (see explanation). Currently, only General Category expressions are converted. But even this is not perfect as the result will depend the Unicode version included in the specific .NET runtime which is executing the parser's code.
- There could be false positive empty string matches in the middle of surrogate pairs. Patterns as simple as
To sum it up, legacy pattern conversion is pretty solid apart from the minor issues listed above. However, support for unicode mode (flag u) patterns is partial and quirky, while conversion of the upcoming unicode sets mode (flag v) will be next to impossible - until the .NET regex engine gets some improved Unicode support.