You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Joachim asked whether property weak (#22) made sense with universal branching.
The definition of SCC might not be very clear in the context of universal branching.
I believe that if we consider a branching transition as several arcs when defining SCCs, our definition of weak matches the established definition of weak alternating automata.
It might even make sense to add a very-weak property in case all SCCs have size 1.
Note that when defined on words (our case) weak alternating Büchi automata are as expressive as alternating Büchi automata and as Büchi automata. However weak Büchi automata are less expressive. So weak really has to be understood as a structural property of the automaton (and I will have to make efforts not to think obligation whenever I read weak).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Joachim asked whether property
weak
(#22) made sense with universal branching.The definition of
SCC
might not be very clear in the context of universal branching.I believe that if we consider a branching transition as several arcs when defining SCCs, our definition of
weak
matches the established definition of weak alternating automata.It might even make sense to add a
very-weak
property in case all SCCs have size 1.Note that when defined on words (our case) weak alternating Büchi automata are as expressive as alternating Büchi automata and as Büchi automata. However weak Büchi automata are less expressive. So
weak
really has to be understood as a structural property of the automaton (and I will have to make efforts not to think obligation whenever I readweak
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: