-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 314
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
jdk_svc_sanity and jdk_jdi has 32 duplicated testcases, which both include jdk_jdi_sanity #3993
Comments
Mine solution: delete jdk_jdi_sanity in jdk_svc_sanity: diff --git a/openjdk/playlist.xml b/openjdk/playlist.xml
index 9dd53626..5e71eac5 100644
--- a/openjdk/playlist.xml
+++ b/openjdk/playlist.xml
@@ -1442,7 +1442,11 @@
-exclude:$(Q)$(TEST_RESROOT)$(D)$(PROBLEM_LIST_FILE)$(Q) \
${FEATURE_PROBLEM_LIST_FILE} \
${VENDOR_PROBLEM_LIST_FILE} \
- $(Q)$(JTREG_JDK_TEST_DIR):jdk_svc_sanity$(Q); \
+ $(Q)$(JTREG_JDK_TEST_DIR):jdk_management_sanity$(Q) \
+ $(Q)$(JTREG_JDK_TEST_DIR):jdk_instrument_sanity(Q) \
+ $(Q)$(JTREG_JDK_TEST_DIR):jdk_jmx_sanity(Q) \
+ $(Q)$(JTREG_JDK_TEST_DIR):jdk_jfr_sanity(Q) \
+ $(Q)$(JTREG_JDK_TEST_DIR):svc_tools_sanity(Q); \
$(TEST_STATUS)</command>
<versions>
<version>11+</version> |
This approach seems reasonable. |
jdk_jfr_sanity( also a subset of jdk_svc_sanity) and jdk_jfr have the exactly same issue. We may need to open an issue for that too. @sendaoYan Is there a way to do a minus jdk_jdi_sanity from jdk_jdi instead of minus jdk_jdi_sanity from jdk_svc_sanity? jdk_svc_sanity is part of sanity level. The solution of #3993 (comment) will move jdk_jdi_sanity from sanity to extended. If the solution can keep the tests in same level that would be great. |
I have no idea how to minus jdk_jdi_sanity from jdk_jdi in openjdk/playlist.xml. |
jdk_svc_sanity and jdk_jdi has 32 duplicate testcases, which both include jdk_jdi_sanity. So delete jdk_jdi_sanity from jdk_svc_sanity to avoid duplicate testcases. Fixes: adoptium#3993 Signed-off-by: sendaoYan <yansendao.ysd@alibaba-inc.com>
jdk_svc_sanity and jdk_jdi has 32 duplicate testcases, which both include jdk_jdi_sanity. So delete jdk_jdi_sanity from jdk_svc_sanity to avoid duplicate testcases. Fixes: adoptium#3993 Signed-off-by: sendaoYan <yansendao.ysd@alibaba-inc.com>
jdk_svc_sanity and jdk_jdi has 32 duplicate testcases, which both include jdk_jdi_sanity. So delete jdk_jdi_sanity from jdk_svc_sanity to avoid duplicate testcases. Fixes: adoptium#3993 Signed-off-by: sendaoYan <yansendao.ysd@alibaba-inc.com>
) jdk_svc_sanity and jdk_jdi has 32 duplicate testcases, which both include jdk_jdi_sanity. So delete jdk_jdi_sanity from jdk_svc_sanity to avoid duplicate testcases. Fixes: #3993 Signed-off-by: sendaoYan <yansendao.ysd@alibaba-inc.com>
Describe the bug
jdk_svc_sanity and jdk_jdi has 32 duplicate testcases, which both include jdk_jdi_sanity
jdk_svc_sanity:
jdk_jdi:
jdk_svc_sanity include jdk_jdi_sanity:
jdk_jdi_sanity:
jdk_jdi:
duplicate testcases:
jdk_jdi_sanity.txt
Expected behavior
The sanity.openjdk and extended.openjdk test target has no any duplicate testcases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: