Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump bitflags from 2.3.1 to 2.4.0 #22

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2023

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Aug 14, 2023

Bumps bitflags from 2.3.1 to 2.4.0.

Release notes

Sourced from bitflags's releases.

2.4.0

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: bitflags/bitflags@2.3.3...2.4.0

2.3.3

Changes to -=

The -= operator was incorrectly changed to truncate bits that didn't correspond to valid flags in 2.3.0. This has been fixed up so it once again behaves the same as - and difference.

Changes to !

The ! operator previously called Self::from_bits_truncate, which would truncate any bits that only partially overlapped with a valid flag. It will now use bits & Self::all().bits(), so any bits that overlap any bits specified by any flag will be respected. This is unlikely to have any practical implications, but enables defining a flag like const ALL = !0 as a way to signal that any bit pattern is a known set of flags.

Changes to formatting

Zero-valued flags will never be printed. You'll either get 0x0 for empty flags using debug formatting, or the set of flags with zero-valued flags omitted for others.

Composite flags will no longer be redundantly printed if there are extra bits to print at the end that don't correspond to a valid flag.

What's Changed

Full Changelog: bitflags/bitflags@2.3.2...2.3.3

2.3.2

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: bitflags/bitflags@2.3.1...2.3.2

Changelog

Sourced from bitflags's changelog.

2.4.0

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: bitflags/bitflags@2.3.3...2.4.0

2.3.3

Changes to -=

The -= operator was incorrectly changed to truncate bits that didn't correspond to valid flags in 2.3.0. This has been fixed up so it once again behaves the same as - and difference.

Changes to !

The ! operator previously called Self::from_bits_truncate, which would truncate any bits that only partially overlapped with a valid flag. It will now use bits & Self::all().bits(), so any bits that overlap any bits specified by any flag will be respected. This is unlikely to have any practical implications, but enables defining a flag like const ALL = !0 as a way to signal that any bit pattern is a known set of flags.

Changes to formatting

Zero-valued flags will never be printed. You'll either get 0x0 for empty flags using debug formatting, or the set of flags with zero-valued flags omitted for others.

Composite flags will no longer be redundantly printed if there are extra bits to print at the end that don't correspond to a valid flag.

What's Changed

Full Changelog: bitflags/bitflags@2.3.2...2.3.3

2.3.2

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: bitflags/bitflags@2.3.1...2.3.2

Commits
  • 472e392 Merge pull request #376 from KodrAus/cargo/2.4.0
  • 3e58685 prepare for 2.4.0 release
  • 2e1be0d Merge pull request #369 from bitflags/feat/spec
  • 6a966d7 fix up an unwanted compiler error
  • a86ed60 update error message
  • ec25c82 ensure compile tests run in CI
  • df23c23 redundant qualifier
  • eb5d8a6 fix up some broken links
  • 635fb14 use const fns for name comparison
  • 6657207 add some key definitions to the readme
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [bitflags](https://github.com/bitflags/bitflags) from 2.3.1 to 2.4.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/bitflags/bitflags/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/bitflags/bitflags/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](bitflags/bitflags@2.3.1...2.4.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: bitflags
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Aug 14, 2023
@adumbidiot adumbidiot merged commit afe6b39 into master Aug 22, 2023
3 checks passed
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/cargo/bitflags-2.4.0 branch August 22, 2023 02:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant