This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 9, 2021. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Merge “Finds by Country“ and “Finds by State“ #4
Comments
Good idea. However, this way you don't have a total for countries that have states. Unless we have something like this:
What do you think? |
You’re right, this information isn’t present in my table. I quickly hacked your proposal into the code and came up with the following: I’m not quite sure about this. It makes the table look a little bit complicated. Another idea is to leave the “Finds by Country“ table untouched and have a separate “Finds by State“ table for each country (if the country has states). |
I think I like your second proposal better. Something like "Finds by State in Germany", "Finds by State in the United States of America" sounds good. :-) |
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
What about merging these two tables and have them look like this:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: