Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix to the exception message of the LinkManager #4388

Merged

Conversation

giovannipizzi
Copy link
Member

The link manager was always referring to an 'input link' while
it should instead refer on an 'input link label' or 'output link label'
depending on the value of the link direction, determined by the self._incoming
attribute.

The link manager was always referring to an 'input link' while
it should instead refer on an 'input link label' or 'output link label'
depending on the value of the link direction, determined by the `self._incoming`
attribute.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 23, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #4388 into develop will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4388      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    79.22%   79.22%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          475      475              
  Lines        34822    34822              
===========================================
+ Hits         27583    27584       +1     
+ Misses        7239     7238       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
#django 73.07% <100.00%> (ø)
#sqlalchemy 72.29% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
aiida/orm/utils/managers.py 92.07% <100.00%> (ø)
aiida/engine/daemon/runner.py 82.76% <0.00%> (+3.45%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 559abba...648c055. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@ramirezfranciscof ramirezfranciscof left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty straightforward change, good to go! Can I merge it? What kind of merge do we use here?

@sphuber
Copy link
Contributor

sphuber commented Sep 24, 2020

Pretty straightforward change, good to go! Can I merge it? What kind of merge do we use here?

Since this is a simple single-commit PR, we use a squash-merge. See the wiki for details on merge policy

@sphuber sphuber merged commit 0184518 into aiidateam:develop Sep 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants