-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Track new connection: #2260
Track new connection: #2260
Conversation
…en not anonymized #2163
@@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ public void track(String action, Map<String, Object> metadata) { | |||
final Map<String, Object> mapCopy = new HashMap<>(metadata); | |||
final TrackingIdentity trackingIdentity = identitySupplier.get(); | |||
mapCopy.put(AIRBYTE_VERSION_KEY, trackingIdentity.getAirbyteVersion()); | |||
if (metadata.containsKey(USER_EMAIL_KEY_PLACEHOLDER) && metadata.get(USER_EMAIL_KEY_PLACEHOLDER).equals(USER_EMAIL_VALUE_PLACEHOLDER)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Option1: I put this little placeholder trick so we can tweak if we want to inject user email or not...
Option2: If we are okay with always sending user email for both "Connector Jobs" and "New Connection - Backend", then this is not needed...
Option3: This could also be solved with a new method in the interface TrackingClient
? trackWithEmail
?
(as commented here: #2163 (comment))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cgardens just want to make sure we are not storing the email if someone opted out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am in favor of option2 let's keeps things simple, we can always revisit if needed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm ok with option 2. are you okay with it @cgardens ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah. option 2 sounds good.
airbyte-analytics/src/main/java/io/airbyte/analytics/TrackingClient.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ public void track(String action, Map<String, Object> metadata) { | |||
final Map<String, Object> mapCopy = new HashMap<>(metadata); | |||
final TrackingIdentity trackingIdentity = identitySupplier.get(); | |||
mapCopy.put(AIRBYTE_VERSION_KEY, trackingIdentity.getAirbyteVersion()); | |||
if (metadata.containsKey(USER_EMAIL_KEY_PLACEHOLDER) && metadata.get(USER_EMAIL_KEY_PLACEHOLDER).equals(USER_EMAIL_VALUE_PLACEHOLDER)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cgardens just want to make sure we are not storing the email if someone opted out.
@@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ public void track(String action, Map<String, Object> metadata) { | |||
final Map<String, Object> mapCopy = new HashMap<>(metadata); | |||
final TrackingIdentity trackingIdentity = identitySupplier.get(); | |||
mapCopy.put(AIRBYTE_VERSION_KEY, trackingIdentity.getAirbyteVersion()); | |||
if (metadata.containsKey(USER_EMAIL_KEY_PLACEHOLDER) && metadata.get(USER_EMAIL_KEY_PLACEHOLDER).equals(USER_EMAIL_VALUE_PLACEHOLDER)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am in favor of option2 let's keeps things simple, we can always revisit if needed
airbyte-analytics/src/main/java/io/airbyte/analytics/TrackingClient.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good assuming we go forward with option 2.
This check is made here: airbyte/airbyte-analytics/src/main/java/io/airbyte/analytics/TrackingClientSingleton.java Line 75 in 20dec48
|
What
Describe what the change is solving
Closes #2163
How
Describe the solution