Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Revert "Update platform containers to use non-root users"" #8612

Conversation

jrhizor
Copy link
Contributor

@jrhizor jrhizor commented Dec 8, 2021

Reverts #8611

Puts back in the original PR. We can iterate on fixing the tests in this PR.

To merge, we need to perform a release immediately after. Otherwise the docker-compose.yaml file will be out of sync with the current version specified, and new users won't be able to onboard.

@github-actions github-actions bot added area/documentation Improvements or additions to documentation area/frontend area/platform issues related to the platform area/scheduler area/server area/worker Related to worker kubernetes labels Dec 8, 2021
@jrhizor jrhizor temporarily deployed to more-secrets December 8, 2021 05:56 Inactive
@jrhizor
Copy link
Contributor Author

jrhizor commented Apr 6, 2022

I'm going to close this for now. I don't think we'll get back to it in the near future and it's getting out of date with new containers we're adding. I imagine this is similar to the work @davinchia and/or connectors will be doing for supporting untrusted custom connectors on Cloud.

I made a new issue #11772 to address doing this work.

@jrhizor jrhizor closed this Apr 6, 2022
@jrhizor jrhizor deleted the revert-8611-revert-7872-dracyr/update-platform-containers-to-use-non-root-user branch April 6, 2022 21:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/documentation Improvements or additions to documentation area/platform issues related to the platform area/scheduler area/server area/worker Related to worker kubernetes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants