-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unitig failure in CA #13
Comments
erase the 4-unitigger 5-, 7- and genome.tigStore and try the latest 3.2.6b version |
please use the latest 3.2.6 version -- the unitig consensus is fixed there |
Hi, |
Yes, there have been, specifically in the unitig consensus. Please use the
official 3.2.6 version.
…--Aleksey
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:58 AM, MarkChristianHarrison < ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi,
a couple of unitig consensus jobs still failed during runCA1, even with
the 3.2.6b version.
Have there been changes in the full version 3.2.6 compared to this beta
version?
Thanks,
Mark
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZ9zHdumAgYl9sdV-vf8DZWnnxzfv_x7ks5tw_MjgaJpZM4TEj65>
.
--
Dr. Alexey V. Zimin
Associate Research Scientist
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Johns Hopkins University,
Baltimore, MD, USA
(301)-437-6260
http://www.genome.umd.edu
http://masurca.blogspot.com
|
Hi, Failure message: scaffolder failed |
Hello,
How much your genome size and how much data? I used MaSuRCA which took more than half year with 20 cpus. Then I stopped it.
Thanks
发自我的 iPhone
… 在 2018年6月21日,下午1:22,gorliver ***@***.***> 写道:
Hi,
I used the official 3.2.6 version and have the same issue.
Here is the last few lines of cgw.out:
...processed 44000000 fragments.
...processed 45000000 fragments.
...processed 46000000 fragments.
...processed 47000000 fragments.
...processed 48000000 fragments.
...processed 49000000 fragments.
...processed 50000000 fragments.
...processed 51000000 fragments.
...processed 52000000 fragments.
...processed 53000000 fragments.
...processed 54000000 fragments.
...processed 55000000 fragments.
...processed 56000000 fragments.
Reading unitigs.
ERROR: Unitig 3856 has no placement; probably not run through consensus.
Failure message:
scaffolder failed
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
Hi, I'm using the version 3.2.6 of masurca and I got the same error. Thanks in advance.
|
I'm having the same issue using 3.2.7. If there is a workaround, I'm happy to try fixes. Thanks, Reading options from '/nobackup/rogers_research/Bivalves/Ehopetonensis/runCA.spec'computeInsertSize=0 Reading options from the command line.cgwErrorRate=0.15
runCA failed. Stack trace: at /apps/pkg/masurca-3.2.7/rhel7_u2-x86_64/gnu/bin/../CA/Linux-amd64/bin/runCA line 1121. Last few lines of the relevant log file (/nobackup/rogers_research/Bivalves/Ehopetonensis/CA/7-0-CGW/cgw.out): ...processed 108000000 fragments. Failure message: scaffolder failed |
Hello, I am having the same issue, using the last version MaSuRCA-3.2.7. Any ideas on how to fix it? Thanks!
|
Hi,
I was using masurca to assemble a genome. Unfortunately, I got an error which I cannot fix, can you please help to fix it.
In runCA3.out, it says
I also looked at http://wgs-assembler.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Unitig_Consensus_Failures_in_CA_6. However, it didn't give a clear solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: