bug(analytical): context.output raise error when result is huge

[acezen]

Describe the bug
User run flash.harmonic_centrality algorithm on a large string id dataset (1.2 billion vertices, 3.2 billion edges), and dumps the result with contest.output. Got error:

To Reproduce

#!/usr/bin/python3

import os
import graphscope
from graphscope.client.session import get_default_session
from graphscope.framework.loader import Loader

graphscope.set_option(show_log=True)


def load_graph(sess, path):
    graph = sess.g(oid_type="string", directed=True, generate_eid=False, retain_oid=False)
    edge = Loader(path, header_row=False, delimiter=",", directed=True)
    graph = graph.add_edges(edge, label='link', src_label="domain", dst_label="domain") 
    return graph

def hamonic_centrality(graph):
    context = graphscope.flash.harmonic_centrality(graph)
    return context

if __name__ == "__main__":
    sess = graphscope.session(cluster_type="hosts", num_workers=1)
    g = load_graph(sess, "/xxx//domain_graph.txt")
    ctx = hamonic_centrality(g)
    ctx.output("/xxxx/harmonic_result.txt", {"id": "v.id", "centrality": "r"})

Environment (please complete the following information):

• GraphScope version: v0.26.0 through pip install graphscope
• OS: Linux
• Version :Ubuntu 20.04

[sighingnow]

Fixed in upstream: apache/arrow#40271

[yecol]

@acezen Please verify the fix and close this issue if possible.

[github-actions]

/cc @sighingnow, this issus/pr has had no activity for for a long time, could you folks help to review the status ?
To suppress further notifications,

• for issues,
  • if it is waiting for further response from the reporter/author, please help to add the label requires-further-info,
  • if you have already started working on it, please add the label work-in-progress to the issue,
  • if this issue requires further designing discussion and not in current plan, or won't be fixed, please add the label requires-further-discussion or wontfix to the issue,
• for pull requests,
  • if you are still working on it and it is not ready for reviewing, please convert this pull request as draft PR,
  • if you have decided to hold this development on, please add the requires-further-discussion label to the pull request.
    Thanks!

[sighingnow]

Closing as fixed in upstream: apache/arrow#40271