Skip to content
Emacs Lisp
Latest commit ac89ab8 May 2, 2011 Aliaksey Kandratsenka fixed readme slightly
Failed to load latest commit information.
COPYING git import Jan 24, 2010
README fixed readme slightly May 2, 2011
regex-dsl.el git import Jan 24, 2010


Tired of deciphering/writing emacs regexps like that one ? (it's from ruby-mode)

Then regex-dsl is for you. It allows you to write regular expressions
in S-exps. Like this: (this is correct expression for js regexp
literal from espresso.el)

(redsl-to-regexp `(concat (char-set "=(,:")
                          (* (or (whitespace) "\n"))
                          (cap-group /)
                          (+ (or (neg-char-set "\\/")
                                 (concat "\\" (anychar))))
                          (cap-group /)))

which is readable (and writable) version of:

Obviously, the problem is double escaping of '\' which needs to be
escaped for regexp and for elisp string. Even single level of escaping
can be confusing, but two levels is simply crazy.

Main function of this package is REDSL-TO-REGEXP which takes list and
converts it to regular expression string. The following forms are

* <string> - concatenation of string's characters

* <symbol> - same as string

* (anychar) - .

* (concat ...) - concatenation

* (char-set <string>) - character set (converted to [<string>>])

* (neg-char-set <string>) - negated character set (converted to

* (cap-group <expr>) - capture group (converted to \\(<expr>\\))

* (group <expr>) - non-capture group (usually not needed, 'cause
  expressions precedence is handled for you)

* (or ...) - alternative (|)

* (\? <expr>) - optional element -- <expr>? (NOTE: ? needs to be escaped)

* *, +, *\?, +\? - repetition

* (word-char) - \w

* (non-word-char) - \W

* (char-chass <class>) - [[:<class>]] construct

* (line-begin), (line-end) - ^ and $

* (whitespace) - \\s-

* (backref <digit>) - \\<digit>

* (literal <string>) - inserts <string> as is into regexp

and others. See source code for more details.

Precedence of regexp expressions are taken into account so you don't
need to worry about placing extra braces.

Backward translator (from regexp string to sexp) is missing. If you
have some free time, please write one.
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.