Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change text to explain the 1% premium #152

Closed
cosmicbro opened this issue Mar 24, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Change text to explain the 1% premium #152

cosmicbro opened this issue Mar 24, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@cosmicbro
Copy link

  • screen shot 2017-03-23 at 6 29 14 pm * What does this mean? Does it mean that the amount displayed above in USD in the amount of BTC converted to dollars minus 1%?
@alvatar alvatar changed the title Clarification plz Change text to explain the 1% premium Mar 25, 2017
@cosmicbro
Copy link
Author

Hey @alvatar, what is it exactly you'd like me to do here? I'm not actually clear on what's being communicated in the UX. So... I'm kinda confused about the intention here.

@alvatar
Copy link
Owner

alvatar commented Apr 7, 2017

The text means that the range there doesn't take into account that the seller will have to fund the Escrow for 1% less of the matched value, since that's the premium he/she will keep.

@cosmicbro
Copy link
Author

cosmicbro commented Apr 8, 2017 via email

@alvatar alvatar closed this as completed Apr 8, 2017
@alvatar
Copy link
Owner

alvatar commented Apr 8, 2017

Man, I've explained this to you a few times. I understand that you have many things in mind, but I can't continue repeating the same things all the time... The premium is taken from the contract amount, and the seller keeps it, so the Escrow is founded for 1% less.

@cosmicbro
Copy link
Author

cosmicbro commented Apr 8, 2017 via email

@alvatar
Copy link
Owner

alvatar commented Apr 9, 2017

Ok, yeah, I'll be around. I'll hack on Sunday.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants