File list #22
Closed
File list #22
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Show current filename along with progress percentage. Shortens paths that are too long for the output window by inserting an ellipsis (...) in the middle.
Corrected assumed 'utf-8' encoding
Show filename in progress update
--file-list option: only use files specifically listed (in file or stdin)
|
This PR is stale, closing. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a
--file-listoption to provide a file with a list of files to scan (one per line). Use-to get the list from stdin, which may be useful for piping output from other tools.The file handle (or a handle to stdin) is passed to the
Bitrotobject, which is responsible for reading the list. I did it here (rather than pass the list) so thatBitrotcan then work out a total size.No provision for wildcards - this could be added too (but obviously it would be more complex, and it might be better handled by piping output from
lsordir).Existing entries in the db that aren't on the list will be deleted. This may be desirable or not - depends on the use case I suppose. Might be worth adding another command-line flag to control this behaviour.