-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(makeServerFetchye): adding run method to response #92
Merged
Matthew-Mallimo
merged 7 commits into
americanexpress:main
from
jjallwood:feat/better-thunk-support
Feb 14, 2024
Merged
feat(makeServerFetchye): adding run method to response #92
Matthew-Mallimo
merged 7 commits into
americanexpress:main
from
jjallwood:feat/better-thunk-support
Feb 14, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit a5cb219:
|
code-forger
reviewed
Feb 9, 2024
code-forger
reviewed
Feb 9, 2024
code-forger
reviewed
Feb 14, 2024
}); | ||
expect(global.fetch).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, 'http://example.com', { | ||
headers: { | ||
dynamicHeader: 'dynamic value 1', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
code-forger
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2024
Matthew-Mallimo
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We have been experimenting with using
fetchye
across our tenancy, and have run into an interesting case where we want to be able to use both thedata
, and the reloadrun
methods as part of our module thunk methods. Currently we get both thedata
object and therun
method into our components via theuseFetchye
hook, we then pass these into our redux thunks as parameters. However this method is clumsy and starts to get heavy when the example includes more than one source of data (we managed to get up to 3x in one case), or when thunks begin to chain calls.This change is to export the
run
method, so both the two interfaces to Fetchye expose the same API to the client. This would allow us to re-use the underlyingmakeOneServerFetchye
methods not only in ourloadModuleData
functions, but in redux thunks to load / get / reload data without getting stuck in parameter hell.Since we have started this change the
oneFetchye
method was added tofetchye-one-app
which compliments our change allowing engineers to just dispatch their fetchye requests in their thunk.What we have today
What we would like to be able to do
Here is how we access the exported
data
,errors
andrun
response within a thunk context via ourloadContactInfo
function