Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project Archiving? #27

Closed
monicabritton opened this issue Sep 17, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Project Archiving? #27

monicabritton opened this issue Sep 17, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@monicabritton
Copy link

Maybe I missed something, but how do I archive a project? It isn't a "status" choice, and the list doesn't change if I check or uncheck "Show archived".

Thanks,

M

@msettles
Copy link

You have to edit then archive, needs to be streamlined

On Friday, September 16, 2016, monicabritton notifications@github.com
wrote:

Maybe I missed something, but how do I archive a project? It isn't a
"status" choice, and the list doesn't change if I check or uncheck "Show
archived".

Thanks,

M


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#27, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAno5nC4h8JQcq5cOOwM6eNnFye_VUsUks5qqzpMgaJpZM4J_dvn
.

Sent from Gmail Mobile on my IPAD Mini 4

@amschaal
Copy link
Owner

What would be preferred? An archive button on the project page?

@monicabritton
Copy link
Author

How about an "Archive/Unarchive" button (or icon) on the main page for each project? (Presuming it can't be added to the "status" choices.)

@msettles
Copy link

What would be the argument on not having it as a status?

Removed it from status because there was also an archive (working one) onn
the project page. I'd advocate removing the archive on the project page and
only have archive as a status.

M

On Sep 21, 2016 5:47 PM, "monicabritton" notifications@github.com wrote:

How about an "Archive/Unarchive" button (or icon) on the main page for
each project? (Presuming it can't be added to the "status" choices.)


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#27 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAno5vhPEvFp1sStTzJRFQD1R-mDZJa7ks5qsdAGgaJpZM4J_dvn
.

@amschaal
Copy link
Owner

The reasons for having archive separate are:

  1. Statuses can be customized per project type, and may not always contain an archived option. The system needs something consistent to rely upon for this behavior.
  2. It may be desirable to archive a project, while maintaining a meaningful status.

It seems the chief complaint is making the archive functionality more accessible. I can make that a click of a button from the project page, or even the projectS page.

@msettles
Copy link

Agree with all you said

On Sep 22, 2016 9:50 AM, "Adam Schaal" notifications@github.com wrote:

The reasons for having archive separate are:

  1. Statuses can be customized per project type, and may not always contain
    an archived option. The system needs something consistent to rely upon for
    this behavior.
  2. It may be desirable to archive a project, while maintaining a
    meaningful status.

It seems the chief complaint is making the archive functionality more
accessible. I can make that a click of a button from the project page, or
even the projectS page.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#27 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAno5o-Q0r5DHOk7MRFgrl2GY-RaHysUks5qsrG7gaJpZM4J_dvn
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants