Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add --results-only switch to grype-db cache backup #268

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 26, 2024

Conversation

asomya
Copy link
Contributor

@asomya asomya commented Mar 22, 2024

adding a --results-only switch to grype-db cache backup that ignores input directories

@asomya asomya force-pushed the ENTERPRISE-3719 branch 2 times, most recently from cdbb842 to eb08cbe Compare March 22, 2024 01:03
Copy link
Contributor

@wagoodman wagoodman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

overall the change is functional 👍 my comments are really about guarding from potential future changes or defending against unintended consequences. Happy to chat about it / pair on it.

cmd/grype-db/cli/commands/cache_backup.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/grype-db/cli/commands/cache_backup.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/grype-db/cli/commands/cache_backup.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/grype-db/cli/commands/cache_backup.go Show resolved Hide resolved
adding a --results-only switch to grype-db cache backup that ignores input directories

Signed-off-by: Arvind Somya <arvind.somya@anchore.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Murphy <will.murphy@anchore.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Murphy <will.murphy@anchore.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Murphy <will.murphy@anchore.com>
@willmurphyscode willmurphyscode merged commit 80af696 into main Mar 26, 2024
14 checks passed
@willmurphyscode willmurphyscode deleted the ENTERPRISE-3719 branch March 26, 2024 19:22
@willmurphyscode willmurphyscode added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants