Skip to content

fix(drag-drop): not starting auto scroll when inside boundary #19865

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2020

Conversation

crisbeto
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto commented Jul 5, 2020

The logic that starts the auto-scrolling sequence was using the pointer position that is constrained within the boundary element which wasn't allowing it to start auto scrolling. These changes also fix some internal issues that I noticed along the way:

  • We were using the pointer position at the last direction change to re-sort the element while dragging. This is incorrect since the user might not have changed direction. Now we use the position at the last pointer event.
  • The _getConstrainedPointerPosition method was mutating the passed in Point which can throw things off downstream.
  • The logic that updates the ClientRect of the boundary element was doing so on any scroll, even if it comes from inside the boundary. Now we only do it if a parent of the boundary was scrolled.

Fixes #18596.

The logic that starts the auto-scrolling sequence was using the pointer position that is constrained within the boundary element which wasn't allow it to start auto scrolling. These changes also fix some internal issues that I noticed along the way:
* We were using the pointer position at the last direction change to re-sort the element while dragging. This is incorrect since the user might not have changed direction. Now we use the position at the last pointer event.
* The `_getConstrainedPointerPosition` method was mutating the passed in `Point` which can throw things off downstream.
* The logic that updates the `ClientRect` of the boundary element was doing so on any scroll, even if it comes from inside the boundary. Now we only do it if a parent of the boundary was scrolled.

Fixes angular#18596.
@crisbeto crisbeto added P3 An issue that is relevant to core functions, but does not impede progress. Important, but not urgent target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Jul 5, 2020
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Jul 5, 2020
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jelbourn jelbourn added lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels Jul 6, 2020
@mmalerba mmalerba merged commit 39d48c7 into angular:master Jul 8, 2020
mmalerba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2020
The logic that starts the auto-scrolling sequence was using the pointer position that is constrained within the boundary element which wasn't allow it to start auto scrolling. These changes also fix some internal issues that I noticed along the way:
* We were using the pointer position at the last direction change to re-sort the element while dragging. This is incorrect since the user might not have changed direction. Now we use the position at the last pointer event.
* The `_getConstrainedPointerPosition` method was mutating the passed in `Point` which can throw things off downstream.
* The logic that updates the `ClientRect` of the boundary element was doing so on any scroll, even if it comes from inside the boundary. Now we only do it if a parent of the boundary was scrolled.

Fixes #18596.
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 8, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement P3 An issue that is relevant to core functions, but does not impede progress. Important, but not urgent target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[drag-drop] Auto-scrolling works poorly with a cdkDragBoundary
4 participants