Skip to content

Conversation

mmalerba
Copy link
Contributor

@mmalerba mmalerba commented Oct 1, 2020

Lifecycle hooks are not being called in some cases due to a weird
interaction between extending TS mixins, running in view engine, and
transpiling the code with tsickle.

Lifecycle hooks are not being called in some cases due to a weird
interaction between extending TS mixins, running in view engine, and
transpiling the code with tsickle.
@mmalerba mmalerba added P2 The issue is important to a large percentage of users, with a workaround G This is is related to a Google internal issue target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release area: material/datepicker labels Oct 1, 2020
@mmalerba mmalerba requested a review from annieyw October 1, 2020 17:43
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Oct 1, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@annieyw annieyw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm but api check is failing

@mmalerba mmalerba added the action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker label Oct 1, 2020
@wagnermaciel wagnermaciel merged commit b59e4a1 into angular:master Oct 7, 2020
wagnermaciel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2020
* fix(material/datepicker): lifecycle hooks not being called

Lifecycle hooks are not being called in some cases due to a weird
interaction between extending TS mixins, running in view engine, and
transpiling the code with tsickle.

* test(material/datepicker): fix api guard tests

(cherry picked from commit b59e4a1)
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 7, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker area: material/datepicker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement G This is is related to a Google internal issue P2 The issue is important to a large percentage of users, with a workaround target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants