Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify and extend ReadMe to improve clarity #9

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Clarify and extend ReadMe to improve clarity #9

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

JohnPettigrew
Copy link

@JohnPettigrew JohnPettigrew commented Jun 29, 2020

I've added an introduction to what Safely does and tweaked the text to improve clarity. One thing I'm not absolutely sure about is where you recommend the reporting service to be configured - I've suggested an initializer.

I've added an introduction to what Safely does and tweaked the test to improve clarity. One thing I'm not absolutely sure about is where you recommend the reporting service to be configured - I've suggested an initializer.
Clarify and extend ReadMe to improve clarity
@ankane
Copy link
Owner

ankane commented Jul 3, 2020

Hey @JohnPettigrew, thanks for the PR! Agree it'd be good clarify where customization should go (in an initializer). Can you explain more about the other changes?

@JohnPettigrew
Copy link
Author

Sure.

  • Moved Build-status button to the top for visibility and improved flow (IMO).
  • Added an explanation of what Safely actually does for people who find this repo first, before finding an explanation elsewhere.
  • Turned terse lines into more explanatory sentences to help newcomers, and improved punctuation throughout.
  • Renamed "Features" section to "Configuration" because that's what it's really about.

Thanks!

@ankane
Copy link
Owner

ankane commented Oct 7, 2020

Hey @JohnPettigrew, sorry for the delay (have been focused on other projects). I appreciate the suggestions, but prefer to keep the existing style.

ankane added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2020
@ankane
Copy link
Owner

ankane commented Oct 7, 2020

I've added a note about the initializer in d47ce49.

@ankane ankane closed this Jul 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants