New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make docsite documentation headers consistent #35520
Comments
Files identified in the description: If these files are inaccurate, please update the |
@acozine Greetings! Thanks for taking the time to open this issue. In order for the community to handle your issue effectively, we need a bit more information. Here are the items we could not find in your description:
Please set the description of this issue with this template: |
Files identified in the description: If these files are inaccurate, please update the |
* added set optoins * minor wording and formatting fixes * changed headers to std as per ansible#35520, also added to main readme * unified inventory plugin devel, referenced from generic plugin dev
Can I help with this? |
@elizabethqiu thanks for the offer - yes, we would welcome your help! Feel free to open a Pull Request or join the #ansible-docs channel on freenode IRC to ask any questions that come up. We have documentation on how to contribute to our documentation. You can also review our Style Guide. |
can I help with this? |
@HarshalGupta1098 That would be great. I'd suggest just doing one file per Pull Request to start with so you can get used to the process. https://github.com/ansible/ansible/tree/devel/docs/docsite/rst corresponds to https://docs.ansible.com/ansible-core/devel/ Feel free to ask here if you have any questions. |
Most of these have been fixed. Look for new individual issues for the few that remain and thanks all for the help! |
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
docsite
ANSIBLE VERSION
SUMMARY
Headers in the current documentation are inconsistent - some use overline, some don't; they use different characters (#### or ****** or =======) to mark headers. It's easier to edit existing documentation or add new documentation if we follow a consistent standard.
Proposed standard:
ACCEPTANCE
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: