Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make docsite documentation headers consistent #35520

Closed
3 of 4 tasks
acozine opened this issue Jan 30, 2018 · 9 comments
Closed
3 of 4 tasks

Make docsite documentation headers consistent #35520

acozine opened this issue Jan 30, 2018 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
docs This issue/PR relates to or includes documentation. docsite This issue/PR relates to the documentation website. easyfix This issue is considered easy to fix by aspiring contributors. hacktoberfest has_pr This issue has an associated PR. support:core This issue/PR relates to code supported by the Ansible Engineering Team.

Comments

@acozine
Copy link
Contributor

acozine commented Jan 30, 2018

ISSUE TYPE
  • Documentation Report
COMPONENT NAME

docsite

ANSIBLE VERSION
2.5
SUMMARY

Headers in the current documentation are inconsistent - some use overline, some don't; they use different characters (#### or ****** or =======) to mark headers. It's easier to edit existing documentation or add new documentation if we follow a consistent standard.

Proposed standard:

# with overline, for parts
* with overline, for chapters
=, for sections
-, for subsections
^, for subsubsections
", for paragraphs
ACCEPTANCE
  • confirm standard and agree on what constitutes a "part" a "chapter" etc.
  • edit files in docsite/rst to use consistent header notation
  • edit style guide to include header notation standards
  • create template for future docs that demonstrates header notation standards
@ansibot
Copy link
Contributor

ansibot commented Jan 30, 2018

Files identified in the description:

If these files are inaccurate, please update the component name section of the description or use the !component bot command.

click here for bot help

@ansibot
Copy link
Contributor

ansibot commented Jan 30, 2018

@acozine Greetings! Thanks for taking the time to open this issue. In order for the community to handle your issue effectively, we need a bit more information.

Here are the items we could not find in your description:

  • ansible version

Please set the description of this issue with this template:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ansible/ansible/devel/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md

click here for bot help

@ansibot
Copy link
Contributor

ansibot commented Jan 30, 2018

@ansibot ansibot added affects_2.5 This issue/PR affects Ansible v2.5 docs_pull_request needs_info This issue requires further information. Please answer any outstanding questions. needs_template This issue/PR has an incomplete description. Please fill in the proposed template correctly. needs_triage Needs a first human triage before being processed. support:core This issue/PR relates to code supported by the Ansible Engineering Team. labels Jan 30, 2018
@sivel sivel removed the needs_triage Needs a first human triage before being processed. label Jan 30, 2018
@ansibot
Copy link
Contributor

ansibot commented Jan 31, 2018

Files identified in the description:

If these files are inaccurate, please update the component name section of the description or use the !component bot command.

click here for bot help

@ansibot ansibot removed needs_info This issue requires further information. Please answer any outstanding questions. needs_template This issue/PR has an incomplete description. Please fill in the proposed template correctly. labels Jan 31, 2018
@ansibot ansibot added docs This issue/PR relates to or includes documentation. and removed docs_report labels Mar 1, 2018
bcoca added a commit to bcoca/ansible that referenced this issue Jun 29, 2018
 * added set optoins
 * minor wording and formatting fixes
 * changed headers to std as per ansible#35520, also added to main readme
 * unified inventory plugin devel, referenced from generic plugin dev
This was referenced Nov 29, 2018
@ansibot ansibot added the docsite This issue/PR relates to the documentation website. label Dec 4, 2018
@samccann samccann added easyfix This issue is considered easy to fix by aspiring contributors. and removed affects_2.5 This issue/PR affects Ansible v2.5 labels Jun 27, 2019
@ansibot ansibot added the has_pr This issue has an associated PR. label Jul 29, 2019
@elizabethqiu
Copy link

Can I help with this?

@acozine
Copy link
Contributor Author

acozine commented Nov 4, 2020

@elizabethqiu thanks for the offer - yes, we would welcome your help! Feel free to open a Pull Request or join the #ansible-docs channel on freenode IRC to ask any questions that come up. We have documentation on how to contribute to our documentation. You can also review our Style Guide.

@HarshalGupta1098
Copy link

can I help with this?

@gundalow
Copy link
Contributor

gundalow commented Mar 4, 2021

can I help with this?

@HarshalGupta1098 That would be great. I'd suggest just doing one file per Pull Request to start with so you can get used to the process.

https://github.com/ansible/ansible/tree/devel/docs/docsite/rst corresponds to https://docs.ansible.com/ansible-core/devel/

Feel free to ask here if you have any questions.

@samccann
Copy link
Contributor

samccann commented Oct 5, 2021

Most of these have been fixed. Look for new individual issues for the few that remain and thanks all for the help!

@samccann samccann closed this as completed Oct 5, 2021
@ansible ansible locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 2, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
docs This issue/PR relates to or includes documentation. docsite This issue/PR relates to the documentation website. easyfix This issue is considered easy to fix by aspiring contributors. hacktoberfest has_pr This issue has an associated PR. support:core This issue/PR relates to code supported by the Ansible Engineering Team.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants