padstack name

[hui-zhou-a]

@maxcapodi78 @svandenb-dev there is a change in the padstack name. It may break customer code, but I think it is better to correct the way how the padstack name is returned in the lone run.

[ansys-reviewer-bot]

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3814 (b80ce85) into main (95f50e4) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3814      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.12%   81.11%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         180      180              
  Lines       62257    62254       -3     
==========================================
- Hits        50504    50498       -6     
- Misses      11753    11756       +3     

[svandenb-dev]

@maxcapodi78 @svandenb-dev there is a change in the padstack name. It may break customer code, but I think it is better to correct the way how the padstack name is returned in the lone run.

I am not sure sure we can change the pin naming (e.g component.pin name). This will for sure break current flows. I remember we had to sync EDB pin name with AEDT ones. @maxcapodi78 what do you think ?