Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on November 30, 2021 #19895

Closed
21 of 44 tasks
potiuk opened this issue Nov 30, 2021 · 16 comments
Closed
21 of 44 tasks

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on November 30, 2021 #19895

potiuk opened this issue Nov 30, 2021 · 16 comments
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases

Comments

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Nov 30, 2021

Body

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
Could you help us to test the RC versions of the providers and let us know in the comment,
if the issue is addressed there.

Providers that need testing

Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:

Provider amazon: 2.5.0rc1

Provider apache.druid: 2.1.0rc1

Provider apache.hdfs: 2.2.0rc1

Provider apache.hive: 2.1.0rc1

Provider apache.spark: 2.0.2rc1

Provider cncf.kubernetes: 2.2.0rc1

Provider databricks: 2.1.0rc1

The Databricks provider will be removed from this round due to #20036.

Provider google: 6.2.0rc1

Provider influxdb: 1.1.0rc1

Provider microsoft.azure: 3.4.0rc1

Provider postgres: 2.4.0rc1

Provider salesforce: 3.4.0rc1

Provider sftp: 2.3.0rc1

Provider snowflake: 2.3.1rc1

Providers that do not need testing

We also had a number of providers that had documentation-only change (mostly around examples). Those need no testing.

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.
@potiuk potiuk added the kind:meta High-level information important to the community label Nov 30, 2021
@harryplumer
Copy link
Contributor

snowflake 2.3.1rc1 looks good!

@eskarimov
Copy link
Contributor

#17446 works as expected

@lwyszomi
Copy link
Contributor

lwyszomi commented Dec 1, 2021

google 6.2.0rc1 works fine

@Aakcht
Copy link
Contributor

Aakcht commented Dec 1, 2021

#19711 and #19777 work as expected, so waiting for the release :)

@raphaelauv
Copy link
Contributor

raphaelauv commented Dec 1, 2021

Checking event.status.container_statuses before filtering (#19713) -> work

@chinwobble
Copy link
Contributor

#19668 tested and working with apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure==3.4.0rc1

@josh-fell
Copy link
Contributor

Verified #18693, #19431, #19475, #19595, and #19383

Thanks again @potiuk!

@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Dec 3, 2021

Thanks for those who tested. Today is last day to do some testing :)

@uranusjr
Copy link
Member

uranusjr commented Dec 3, 2021

cc @dimon222 for #19815

@alexott
Copy link
Contributor

alexott commented Dec 3, 2021

I have capacity to test only over the weekend...

@subkanthi
Copy link
Contributor

subkanthi commented Dec 4, 2021

Tested #19489 and #19356

@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Dec 4, 2021

@alexott - good we need to more votes so still some time :)

@alexott
Copy link
Contributor

alexott commented Dec 4, 2021

Tested #19722, #19585, #19335, #19412.
Unfortunately there is a logical error in calculation of the expiration time that may lead to authentication error when executing long-running jobs, just submitted a very small PR to fix it: #20036 - it would be nice to include it into release

@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Dec 4, 2021

Tested #19722, #19585, #19335, #19412. Unfortunately there is a logical error in calculation of the expiration time that may lead to authentication error when executing long-running jobs, just submitted a very small PR to fix it: #20036 - it would be nice to include it into release

Thanks!

I can remove it from the release and make ad-hoc rc2 for databricks only. This is how we deal with it when we find problems with a candidate provider.

@humit0
Copy link
Contributor

humit0 commented Dec 5, 2021

Tested #19420

@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Dec 6, 2021

Thanks everyone who helped. I am preparing Databricks relase separately now!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests