Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Databricks - allow Azure SP authentication on other Azure clouds #19722

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2021

Conversation

alexott
Copy link
Contributor

@alexott alexott commented Nov 20, 2021

When other Azure clouds are used (US GovCloud, China, ...) other authentication endpoints should be used. This PR allows to overwrite the authentication endpoint when using other clouds

When other Azure clouds are used (US GovCloud, China, ...) other
authentication endpoints should be used.  This PR allows to overwrite
the authentication endpoint when using other clouds
@alexott alexott changed the title Databricks - allow Azure SP authentication on other clouds Databricks - allow Azure SP authentication on other Azure clouds Nov 20, 2021
…s.rst

Co-authored-by: Tzu-ping Chung <uranusjr@gmail.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests label Nov 22, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because it does not modify the core of Airflow. If the committers decide that the full tests matrix is needed, they will add the label 'full tests needed'. Then you should rebase to the latest main or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great to see Databricks contributing for better integration!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:providers kind:documentation okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants