-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 786
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Incorrect Offset Validation for Sliced List Array Children #1814
Comments
tustvold
added a commit
to tustvold/arrow-rs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 7, 2022
Fix offset validation for sliced children of list arrays (apache#1814)
tustvold
added a commit
to tustvold/arrow-rs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 7, 2022
Fix offset validation for sliced children of list arrays (apache#1814)
tustvold
added a commit
to tustvold/arrow-rs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 7, 2022
Fix offset validation for sliced children of list arrays (apache#1814)
tustvold
added a commit
to tustvold/arrow-rs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 7, 2022
Fix offset validation for sliced children of list arrays (apache#1814)
tustvold
added a commit
to tustvold/arrow-rs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 7, 2022
Fix offset validation for sliced children of list arrays (apache#1814)
alamb
changed the title
Incorrect Offset Validation for Sliced List Array Children
Fix Incorrect Offset Validation for Sliced List Array Children
Jun 9, 2022
alamb
changed the title
Fix Incorrect Offset Validation for Sliced List Array Children
Incorrect Offset Validation for Sliced List Array Children
Jun 9, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the bug
Should pass, however,
validate_dictionary_offset
does not use the correct max offset during validation.The good news is that the logic in
validate()
is correct, and will catch that the final offset is too large, and so this will be caught byfull_validate()
(i.e. this is not a soundness issue)To Reproduce
See test
Expected behavior
The test should pass
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: