Nit: use the standard function div_ceil

[HaoYang670]

Signed-off-by: remzi 13716567376yh@gmail.com

Which issue does this PR close?

None. It is just a small change.

What changes are included in this PR?

We should use the standard function div_ceil instead of implementing our own.

Are there any user-facing changes?

None

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1629 (79a964f) into master (7da41c7) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 79a964f differs from pull request most recent head fd979b1. Consider uploading reports for the commit fd979b1 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1629      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.03%   83.03%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         193      193              
  Lines       55472    55469       -3     
==========================================
- Hits        46059    46056       -3     
  Misses       9413     9413              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
arrow/src/util/bit_util.rs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
arrow/src/datatypes/datatype.rs	66.40% <0.00%> (-0.40%)	⬇️
arrow/src/array/transform/mod.rs	86.68% <0.00%> (-0.12%)	⬇️
parquet/src/encodings/encoding.rs	93.56% <0.00%> (+0.18%)	⬆️
parquet_derive/src/parquet_field.rs	66.21% <0.00%> (+0.22%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7da41c7...fd979b1. Read the comment docs.

[alamb]

Thanks @HaoYang670