Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[C++] CSV and JSON benchmarks should present a items/s or bytes/s metric #39666

Closed
Tracked by #39662
pitrou opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #39764
Closed
Tracked by #39662

[C++] CSV and JSON benchmarks should present a items/s or bytes/s metric #39666

pitrou opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #39764

Comments

@pitrou
Copy link
Member

pitrou commented Jan 17, 2024

Describe the enhancement requested

We should scan through these benchmarks and look for those that only a present an iteration time.

Component(s)

Benchmarking, C++

@pitrou pitrou self-assigned this Jan 23, 2024
pitrou added a commit to pitrou/arrow that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2024
pitrou added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2024
…tems/s metric (#39764)

### Rationale for this change

Some of our microbenchmarks only present an iteration time in (nano,micro...)seconds. That is usually tedious to read and difficult to interpret.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Ensure that benchmarks present a items/seconds and/or a bytes/seconds metric where that makes sense.

### Are these changes tested?

Manually.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.
* Closes: #39666

Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
@pitrou pitrou added this to the 16.0.0 milestone Jan 23, 2024
dgreiss pushed a commit to dgreiss/arrow that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2024
…s or items/s metric (apache#39764)

### Rationale for this change

Some of our microbenchmarks only present an iteration time in (nano,micro...)seconds. That is usually tedious to read and difficult to interpret.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Ensure that benchmarks present a items/seconds and/or a bytes/seconds metric where that makes sense.

### Are these changes tested?

Manually.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.
* Closes: apache#39666

Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
zanmato1984 pushed a commit to zanmato1984/arrow that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2024
…s or items/s metric (apache#39764)

### Rationale for this change

Some of our microbenchmarks only present an iteration time in (nano,micro...)seconds. That is usually tedious to read and difficult to interpret.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Ensure that benchmarks present a items/seconds and/or a bytes/seconds metric where that makes sense.

### Are these changes tested?

Manually.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.
* Closes: apache#39666

Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
thisisnic pushed a commit to thisisnic/arrow that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2024
…s or items/s metric (apache#39764)

### Rationale for this change

Some of our microbenchmarks only present an iteration time in (nano,micro...)seconds. That is usually tedious to read and difficult to interpret.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Ensure that benchmarks present a items/seconds and/or a bytes/seconds metric where that makes sense.

### Are these changes tested?

Manually.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.
* Closes: apache#39666

Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant