-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[C++] CSV and JSON benchmarks should present a items/s or bytes/s metric #39666
Closed
Tracked by
#39662
Comments
7 tasks
pitrou
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2024
…tems/s metric (#39764) ### Rationale for this change Some of our microbenchmarks only present an iteration time in (nano,micro...)seconds. That is usually tedious to read and difficult to interpret. ### What changes are included in this PR? Ensure that benchmarks present a items/seconds and/or a bytes/seconds metric where that makes sense. ### Are these changes tested? Manually. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * Closes: #39666 Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
dgreiss
pushed a commit
to dgreiss/arrow
that referenced
this issue
Feb 19, 2024
…s or items/s metric (apache#39764) ### Rationale for this change Some of our microbenchmarks only present an iteration time in (nano,micro...)seconds. That is usually tedious to read and difficult to interpret. ### What changes are included in this PR? Ensure that benchmarks present a items/seconds and/or a bytes/seconds metric where that makes sense. ### Are these changes tested? Manually. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * Closes: apache#39666 Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
zanmato1984
pushed a commit
to zanmato1984/arrow
that referenced
this issue
Feb 28, 2024
…s or items/s metric (apache#39764) ### Rationale for this change Some of our microbenchmarks only present an iteration time in (nano,micro...)seconds. That is usually tedious to read and difficult to interpret. ### What changes are included in this PR? Ensure that benchmarks present a items/seconds and/or a bytes/seconds metric where that makes sense. ### Are these changes tested? Manually. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * Closes: apache#39666 Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
thisisnic
pushed a commit
to thisisnic/arrow
that referenced
this issue
Mar 8, 2024
…s or items/s metric (apache#39764) ### Rationale for this change Some of our microbenchmarks only present an iteration time in (nano,micro...)seconds. That is usually tedious to read and difficult to interpret. ### What changes are included in this PR? Ensure that benchmarks present a items/seconds and/or a bytes/seconds metric where that makes sense. ### Are these changes tested? Manually. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * Closes: apache#39666 Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the enhancement requested
We should scan through these benchmarks and look for those that only a present an iteration time.
Component(s)
Benchmarking, C++
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: