[Doc][Format] Implementation status page should list canonical extension types #40799
Comments
rok
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2024
…cal extension types (#41053) ### Rationale for this change Two specifications and one implementation of canonical extension types were added and this should be documented. ### What changes are included in this PR? This represents current state of canonical extension types. ### Are these changes tested? No, docs only. ### Are there any user-facing changes? In so much as they read docs. * GitHub Issue: #40799 Authored-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org> Signed-off-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org>
|
Issue resolved by pull request 41053 |
raulcd
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…cal extension types (#41053) ### Rationale for this change Two specifications and one implementation of canonical extension types were added and this should be documented. ### What changes are included in this PR? This represents current state of canonical extension types. ### Are these changes tested? No, docs only. ### Are there any user-facing changes? In so much as they read docs. * GitHub Issue: #40799 Authored-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org> Signed-off-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org>
verma-kartik
pushed a commit
to verma-kartik/arrow
that referenced
this issue
Apr 11, 2024
…canonical extension types (apache#41053) ### Rationale for this change Two specifications and one implementation of canonical extension types were added and this should be documented. ### What changes are included in this PR? This represents current state of canonical extension types. ### Are these changes tested? No, docs only. ### Are there any user-facing changes? In so much as they read docs. * GitHub Issue: apache#40799 Authored-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org> Signed-off-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org>
vibhatha
pushed a commit
to vibhatha/arrow
that referenced
this issue
Apr 15, 2024
…canonical extension types (apache#41053) ### Rationale for this change Two specifications and one implementation of canonical extension types were added and this should be documented. ### What changes are included in this PR? This represents current state of canonical extension types. ### Are these changes tested? No, docs only. ### Are there any user-facing changes? In so much as they read docs. * GitHub Issue: apache#40799 Authored-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org> Signed-off-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org>
tolleybot
pushed a commit
to tmct/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 2, 2024
…canonical extension types (apache#41053) ### Rationale for this change Two specifications and one implementation of canonical extension types were added and this should be documented. ### What changes are included in this PR? This represents current state of canonical extension types. ### Are these changes tested? No, docs only. ### Are there any user-facing changes? In so much as they read docs. * GitHub Issue: apache#40799 Authored-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org> Signed-off-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org>
tolleybot
pushed a commit
to tmct/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 4, 2024
…canonical extension types (apache#41053) ### Rationale for this change Two specifications and one implementation of canonical extension types were added and this should be documented. ### What changes are included in this PR? This represents current state of canonical extension types. ### Are these changes tested? No, docs only. ### Are there any user-facing changes? In so much as they read docs. * GitHub Issue: apache#40799 Authored-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org> Signed-off-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org>
rok
added a commit
to tmct/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2024
…canonical extension types (apache#41053) ### Rationale for this change Two specifications and one implementation of canonical extension types were added and this should be documented. ### What changes are included in this PR? This represents current state of canonical extension types. ### Are these changes tested? No, docs only. ### Are there any user-facing changes? In so much as they read docs. * GitHub Issue: apache#40799 Authored-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org> Signed-off-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org>
rok
added a commit
to tmct/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2024
…canonical extension types (apache#41053) ### Rationale for this change Two specifications and one implementation of canonical extension types were added and this should be documented. ### What changes are included in this PR? This represents current state of canonical extension types. ### Are these changes tested? No, docs only. ### Are there any user-facing changes? In so much as they read docs. * GitHub Issue: apache#40799 Authored-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org> Signed-off-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org>
vibhatha
pushed a commit
to vibhatha/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 25, 2024
…canonical extension types (apache#41053) ### Rationale for this change Two specifications and one implementation of canonical extension types were added and this should be documented. ### What changes are included in this PR? This represents current state of canonical extension types. ### Are these changes tested? No, docs only. ### Are there any user-facing changes? In so much as they read docs. * GitHub Issue: apache#40799 Authored-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org> Signed-off-by: Rok Mihevc <rok@mihevc.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the enhancement requested
Canonical extension types should be listed as a new subsection at the end of the https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/status.html#data-types section.
Component(s)
Documentation, Format
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: