Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Python] Failing pandas tests because of downstream datetime64 unit changes #41978

Closed
jorisvandenbossche opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

Pandas changed the default unit used in certain cases for the datetime64[unit] dtype. This causes some failures in our test suite when tested with pandas 3.0.0.dev

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche self-assigned this Jun 5, 2024
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche changed the title [Python] Failing pandas tests because of upstream datetime64 unit changes [Python] Failing pandas tests because of downstream datetime64 unit changes Jun 5, 2024
jorisvandenbossche added a commit to jorisvandenbossche/arrow that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2024
jorisvandenbossche added a commit to jorisvandenbossche/arrow that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2024
jorisvandenbossche added a commit to jorisvandenbossche/arrow that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2024
jorisvandenbossche added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 18, 2024
…nit changes (#41979)

### Rationale for this change

Pandas changed the default unit used in certain cases for the `datetime64[unit]` dtype. This causes some failures in our test suite when tested with pandas 3.0.0.dev

* GitHub Issue: #41978

Authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added this to the 17.0.0 milestone Jun 18, 2024
@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member Author

Issue resolved by pull request 41979
#41979

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant