GH-35081: [Python] construct pandas.DataFrame with public API in to_pandas
#40897
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
Component: Python
awaiting committer review
jorisvandenbossche
changed the title
to_pandasto_pandas
|
@github-actions crossbow submit test-conda-python-3.11-pandas-upstream_devel test-conda-python-3.10-pandas-nightly |
|
Revision: f99132f Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-4a17ce5567
|
|
@github-actions crossbow submit test-conda-python-3.11-pandas-upstream_devel test-conda-python-3.10-pandas-nightly |
|
Revision: f99132f Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-99e6ea1ff1
|
jorisvandenbossche
removed
the
awaiting committer review
2 tasks
raulcd
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2024
…pandas` (#40897) ### Rationale for this change Avoiding using pandas internals to create Block objects ourselves, using a new API for pandas>=3 * GitHub Issue: #35081 Authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 7 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit eb47fd6. There was 1 benchmark result indicating a performance regression:
The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 10 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
tolleybot
pushed a commit
to tmct/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
…n `to_pandas` (apache#40897) ### Rationale for this change Avoiding using pandas internals to create Block objects ourselves, using a new API for pandas>=3 * GitHub Issue: apache#35081 Authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
vibhatha
pushed a commit
to vibhatha/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2024
…n `to_pandas` (apache#40897) ### Rationale for this change Avoiding using pandas internals to create Block objects ourselves, using a new API for pandas>=3 * GitHub Issue: apache#35081 Authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
Avoiding using pandas internals to create Block objects ourselves, using a new API for pandas>=3