Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BEAM-3804] Build Go SDK container with gradle #4833

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 9, 2018

Conversation

herohde
Copy link
Contributor

@herohde herohde commented Mar 8, 2018

Code is similar to how the Python and Java containers are built.

@herohde
Copy link
Contributor Author

herohde commented Mar 8, 2018

R: @lukecwik

}

golang {
packagePath = 'github.com/apache/beam/sdks/python/boot'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doesn't seem like the appropriate package path.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed the typo for clarity. This package path is not actually used, because we're building a main package.

}

docker {
String repositoryRoot
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems like we could make this part of the applyDockerNature as it seems duplicated amongst the three docker container build.gradle files.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed. I'll try to spend some time on this on Gradle fixit day.

@herohde
Copy link
Contributor Author

herohde commented Mar 8, 2018

Thanks @lukecwik. PTAL

@lukecwik lukecwik merged commit 006ff12 into apache:master Mar 9, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants