Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

initial support for custom maven repositories #238

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2018

Conversation

lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@nicolaferraro nicolaferraro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, what about adding a general conf?

@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ type IntegrationSpec struct {
Profile TraitProfile `json:"profile,omitempty"`
Traits map[string]IntegrationTraitSpec `json:"traits,omitempty"`
Configuration []ConfigurationSpec `json:"configuration,omitempty"`
Repositories []string `json:"repositories,omitempty"`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's important to set this at Integration level as you did, but it's more to support snippets in the future... I'd put it also at IntegrationPlatform level, so that one can specify repositories for the global installation.

And the one at integration level overrides the one at platform level. I'm not sure about context level repo.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes but the whole platform configuration is another and wider topic so I left it for future development :)

@nicolaferraro nicolaferraro merged commit ba28129 into apache:master Nov 26, 2018
@lburgazzoli lburgazzoli deleted the maven-repo branch November 26, 2018 09:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants