Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed package.json Version to 1.1.0-dev #65

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2019

Conversation

erisu
Copy link
Member

@erisu erisu commented Jun 13, 2019

Platforms affected

none

Motivation and Context

There was a discrepancy between the package.json and package-lock.json.
This PR sets package.json to match with package-lock.json and prepare for the minor release.

Description

Updated package.json

Testing

none

Checklist

  • I've run the tests to see all new and existing tests pass
  • I added automated test coverage as appropriate for this change
  • If this Pull Request resolves an issue, I linked to the issue in the text above (and used the correct keyword to close issues using keywords)
  • I've updated the documentation if necessary

@erisu erisu requested a review from dpogue June 13, 2019 05:15
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 13, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #65 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master    #65   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files          14     14           
  Lines         615    615           
=====================================
  Hits          615    615

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c535c15...4ea5446. Read the comment docs.

@erisu erisu merged commit 4cc33cc into apache:master Jun 13, 2019
@erisu erisu deleted the fix-package-version branch June 13, 2019 05:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants