-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Fix](Jdbc-Hive) fix the order of partition keys #33963
Conversation
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 38855 ms
|
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 186711 ms
|
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30 s
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, please add comment
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
The partition key information recorded in PARTITION_KEYS table is sorted according to the INTEGER_IDX field, so we need to add an 'order by' clause to ensure that the obtained partition names are ordered.
The partition key information recorded in PARTITION_KEYS table is sorted according to the INTEGER_IDX field, so we need to add an 'order by' clause to ensure that the obtained partition names are ordered.
The partition key information recorded in PARTITION_KEYS table is sorted according to the INTEGER_IDX field, so we need to add an 'order by' clause to ensure that the obtained partition names are ordered.
Proposed changes
Issue Number: close #xxx
The partition key information recorded in
PARTITION_KEYS
table is sorted according to theINTEGER_IDX
field, so we need to add an 'order by' clause to ensure that the obtained partition names are ordered.Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...