[hotfix][connector-jdbc] Fix a method name typo in postgres unit test.

[a49a]

What is the purpose of the change

fix a method name typo in postgres unit test.

Brief change log

• change tesArrayDataTypes to testArrayDataTypes in PostgresCatalogTest class

Verifying this change

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

• Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
• The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
• The serializers: (no)
• The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
• Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (no)
• The S3 file system connector: (no)

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (not documented)

[flinkbot]

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit 8519888 (Thu Jul 29 09:50:37 UTC 2021)

Warnings:

• No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

_{Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.}

Review Progress

• ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
• ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
• ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
• ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
• ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.

The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required

Bot commands

The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

• @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
• @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
• @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
• @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
• @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

[flinkbot]

CI report:

• 1ebbbf8 Azure: SUCCESS

Bot commands

The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

• @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

[a49a]

@snuyanzin please review it

[snuyanzin]

LGTM

[a49a]

@leonardBang please review and merge it, thanks.

[a49a]

@MartijnVisser please review it.

[MartijnVisser]

@deadwind4 Thank you for your contribution. Please don't ping multiple people. It can be quite annoying for people who are working on open source contributions and can actually cause people to ignore these type of pings. As you can see (based on the number of open PRs), there are a lot of open items that need attention. Everyone tries their best to get as much contributions in as possible.

The better the PR is, the higher chance it can be merged quickly. In this case, the PR is not completely following the PR guidelines (as can be found on https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) and the commit message could also be better to meet the Code Style & Quality Guidelines, which can be found at https://flink.apache.org/contributing/code-style-and-quality-preamble.html.

From a priority perspective, this PR addresses a typo in a test, which is not the highest priority for a fix since the impact for users is rather limited.

[MartijnVisser]

@deadwind4 Can you also update your commit message?

[a49a]

I have updated commit message.

[MartijnVisser]

@flinkbot run azure

[MartijnVisser]

@deadwind4 Can you please rebase your local branch on master ?

[a49a]

@MartijnVisser I have rebased on master. Merry Christmas.

[MartijnVisser]

@flinkbot run azure

[MartijnVisser]

@flinkbot run azure

[MartijnVisser]

LGTM. @fapaul can you please merge it?

[leonardBang]

LGTM, thanks @MartijnVisser @deadwind4

[MartijnVisser]

Thanks @leonardBang