HADOOP-18541. Upgrade grizzly version to 2.4.4

[dmmkr]

Description of PR

Upgrade grizzly version to 2.4.4

How was this patch tested?

Local compilation sucessful

For code changes:

• Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
• Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
• If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
• If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 52s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 0s		detect-secrets was not available.
+0 🆗	xmllint	0m 0s		xmllint was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	39m 58s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 39s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	compile	0m 32s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 35s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 37s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 40s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	shadedclient	63m 11s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	0m 18s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 22s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javac	0m 22s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 17s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	javac	0m 17s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 21s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 22s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 19s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	shadedclient	22m 3s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	0m 23s		hadoop-project in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 45s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		90m 18s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5167/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#5167
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient codespell detsecrets xmllint
uname	Linux 84299e3ff4b1 4.15.0-191-generic #202-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 4 01:49:29 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / eb8344d
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5167/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	562 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-project U: hadoop-project
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5167/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[steveloughran]

AFAIK, grizzly is only used in test, so this isn't something we should be distributing.

how fussy is grizzly about jersey versions -as if it expects any changes there or nearby it can't be upgraded without production-time classpath incompatibilities?

[pjfanning]

tests seem to have passed - maybe it is best to merge this since it only affects tests - probably not really a major candidate for backporting