Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOCS] metadata.annotations: Too long #774

Closed
2 of 3 tasks
xianjingfeng opened this issue Mar 28, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #853
Closed
2 of 3 tasks

[DOCS] metadata.annotations: Too long #774

xianjingfeng opened this issue Mar 28, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #853
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@xianjingfeng
Copy link
Member

xianjingfeng commented Mar 28, 2023

Code of Conduct

Search before asking

  • I have searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

Which parts of the documentation do you think need improvement?

[root@localhost bases]# kubectl -n spark apply -f uniffle.apache.org_remoteshuffleservices.yaml 
The CustomResourceDefinition "remoteshuffleservices.uniffle.apache.org" is invalid: metadata.annotations: Too long: must have at most 262144 bytes

kubectl create is ok

Maybe we need modify this line

kubectl apply -f ${crd-yaml-file}

Affects Version(s)

master

Improving the documentation

No response

Anything else

No response

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
@xianjingfeng xianjingfeng added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Mar 28, 2023
@xianjingfeng xianjingfeng changed the title [DOCS] [DOCS] metadata.annotations: Too long Mar 28, 2023
jerqi pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2023
…853)

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fix the metadata.annotations: Too long in `install.md`

### Why are the changes needed?

Solve the error message encountered below when using `kubectl apply -f`

`The CustomResourceDefinition "remoteshuffleservices.uniffle.apache.org" is invalid: metadata.annotations: Too long: must have at most 262144 bytes
`

Fix: #774 

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

No.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant