-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[#854][FOLLOWUP] feat(tez): Add Simple Fetched Allocator to allocation memory or disk for shuffle data #922
Conversation
…ble(long), configureAndStart()
.../java/org/apache/tez/runtime/library/common/shuffle/impl/RssSimpleFetchedInputAllocator.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #922 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 55.53% 57.56% +2.02%
- Complexity 2246 2365 +119
============================================
Files 341 334 -7
Lines 16626 15711 -915
Branches 1327 1414 +87
============================================
- Hits 9234 9044 -190
+ Misses 6863 6153 -710
+ Partials 529 514 -15
... and 41 files with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
should we fix this test case ? it can run in my local computer.
|
We delete the failed local disk test case to make test pass. |
You should fix this issue. You can use your own github pipeline to reproduce it. |
Yes, I think it's necessary and you should set up an issue. |
...a/org/apache/tez/runtime/library/common/shuffle/impl/RssSimpleFetchedInputAllocatorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...a/org/apache/tez/runtime/library/common/shuffle/impl/RssSimpleFetchedInputAllocatorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks @lifeSo , merged to master.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add Simple Fetched Allocator to allcation memory or disk for shuffle data
Why are the changes needed?
Fix: #854
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
unit test case