Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove binaryValue() on VectorValues and ByteVectorValues. #12101

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2023

Conversation

jpountz
Copy link
Contributor

@jpountz jpountz commented Jan 23, 2023

This method tries to expose an encoded view of vectors, but we shouldn't have this part of our user-facing API. With this change, the way vectors are encoded is entirely on the codec.

This method tries to expose an encoded view of vectors, but we shouldn't have
this part of our user-facing API. With this change, the way vectors are encoded
is entirely on the codec.
@jpountz jpountz added this to the 9.5.0 milestone Jan 23, 2023
@jpountz
Copy link
Contributor Author

jpountz commented Jan 23, 2023

This change was more mechanical that I had anticipated thanks to @benwtrent 's recent refactorings.

Copy link
Contributor

@javanna javanna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@benwtrent benwtrent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So happy to see all this code deleted!

@jpountz jpountz merged commit de94fa9 into apache:main Jan 23, 2023
@jpountz jpountz deleted the remove_vector_binaryValue branch January 23, 2023 13:43
jpountz added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2023
This method tries to expose an encoded view of vectors, but we shouldn't have
this part of our user-facing API. With this change, the way vectors are encoded
is entirely on the codec.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants