-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LUCENE-10236: Add change entry #456
LUCENE-10236: Add change entry #456
Conversation
lucene/CHANGES.txt
Outdated
@@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ Optimizations | |||
|
|||
Bug Fixes | |||
--------------------- | |||
(No changes) | |||
|
|||
* LUCENE-10236: Update field-weight used in CombinedFieldQuery scoring calculation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe say a bit more about what really changed than just "update", e.g. stop duplicating norms and term frequencies when scoring in CombinedFieldQuery
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah sorry. I've updated it accordingly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @mikemccand , just want to check back on this to see if the updated entry looks good to you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh yes looks great sorry for the slow response!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem, thanks @mikemccand for the review and approval!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @zacharymorn
Hmm actually this issue was fixed in 9.0.0, I think? |
This change entry is for 07ee3ba#diff-27a1984493254d0af3e9c50caee47443abbbdc79a87b4c348300bcb317a0a5b2, as I forgot to add it in that merge. I checked the commit immediately after mine ad911df on On the other hand, Not sure if I may miss something? |
Hi @mikemccand , just want to check back on this and see if you have any further concern? |
Aha, perfect, looks great! +1 to push. Sorry for the delay @zacharymorn. |
No problem! Thanks for the review and approval! |
No description provided.