Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(plc4py/umas): Why not start implementing umas #1339

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Feb 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hutcheb
Copy link
Contributor

@hutcheb hutcheb commented Jan 13, 2024

Schneider UMAS protocol branch

Realized that I need to get the unit identifier before I can lookup the umas request function code
Next order the variables and work out the max number of variables we can read.
# Conflicts:
#	sandbox/plc4py/plc4py/protocols/modbus/readwrite/ModbusPDUGetComEventCounterRequest.py
#	sandbox/plc4py/plc4py/protocols/modbus/readwrite/ModbusPDUGetComEventLogRequest.py
#	sandbox/plc4py/plc4py/protocols/modbus/readwrite/ModbusPDUReadExceptionStatusRequest.py
#	sandbox/plc4py/plc4py/protocols/modbus/readwrite/ModbusPDUReportServerIdRequest.py
#	sandbox/plc4py/plc4py/spi/generation/ReadBuffer.py
@hutcheb hutcheb marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2024 16:22
@hutcheb hutcheb merged commit 780a104 into develop Feb 10, 2024
35 checks passed
@hutcheb hutcheb deleted the feat/plc4py/umas branch February 10, 2024 16:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant