Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can support delay level configuration in async mode #36

Closed
xiaolongyuan opened this issue Jan 22, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Can support delay level configuration in async mode #36

xiaolongyuan opened this issue Jan 22, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@xiaolongyuan
Copy link

同步消息可以使用:
rocketMQTemplate.syncSend(topic,msg,5000,delayTimeLevel);

异步发送没有相关接口设置

@vongosling vongosling changed the title 异步消息发送支持延迟级别设置 Can support delay level settings in async mode Jan 22, 2019
@vongosling vongosling added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 22, 2019
@vongosling vongosling changed the title Can support delay level settings in async mode Can support delay level configuration in async mode Jan 22, 2019
@walking98
Copy link
Contributor

supported, please look into:

public SendResult syncSend(String destination, Message<?> message, long timeout, int delayLevel) {

@xiaolongyuan
Copy link
Author

@walking98 这是同步发送的 我是指 异步发送时 没有 延迟级别设置哈

@vongosling vongosling added this to the 2.0.3 milestone Apr 3, 2019
@walking98
Copy link
Contributor

@xiaolongyuan sorry for the mis-understand. we will add this soon.

ShannonDing added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2019
[ISSUE #36]Support delay level configuration in async mode
@ShannonDing
Copy link
Member

@xiaolongyuan It will be released in the next version.

liuliuzo pushed a commit to liuliuzo/rocketmq-spring that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2020
[ISSUE apache#36]Support delay level configuration in async mode
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants